Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 February 8

< February 7	February 9 >

February 8

File:Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King wedding day, 1953.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, an image of their wedding is not necessary to the article. January (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The image of the marriage that initially triggered her prominence and would ultimately lead to her becoming the torch bearer after the man she married was assassinated for the rest of her life is not "necessary" for her article? Alright then. Informant16 —Preceding undated comment added 00:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reader does not need to see a picture of their wedding to understand the significance of their marriage. January (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nor does the reader need to see the portraits of presidents of their articles to understand the importance of their presidency. And if no picture is needed to understand "the significance of their marriage", then why even have that for anybody? Why is it on Gerald Ford, President Reagan and Mrs. Reagan's articles? There is no free alternative to the image and there probably is never going to be one. That marriage, as you agreed with me judging by your wording, is significant. And I would say that it was a life changing event for both of the Kings, so why remove it? There's no free alternative, there's no free excuse. Informant16 —Preceding undated comment added 03:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The other articles you cite as examples are using free images. I certainly wouldn't question using this image if it was free, but non-free images can only be used if "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" (WP:NFCC#8). I don't see how omission of this image would be detrimental to readers' understanding, the reader does not need to see a photograph of their wedding to understand that they got married. January (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coretta Scott King, 1970s.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MER-C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1 and 8 as there are plenty of free images of the subject taken at various points in her life (see Commons:Category:Coretta Scott King), also possibly 10c. January (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sorry but there are many free images of Mrs King as January says. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kumarakom paddy fields.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept 1 - looking at both I think it's clear the user intended to release this self-made image but made a mistake on one of the uploads - Peripitus (Talk) 06:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate file: uploaded twice with different copyright information. Unclear what's correct. Stefan2 (talk) 13:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coretta Scott young.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 13:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jackie Kennedy and Coretta Scott King, 1968.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's just delete everything. Whoever heard of images anyway. We can't have that on Wikipedia, no instead we have to remove everything. Informant16 —Preceding undated comment added 15:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This could be kept if there was better discussion on its use. Two widows comforting each other is visually compelling and emotionally powerful. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think it also fails WP:NFCC#10a, the source given is a direct link to the image on Tumblr which doesn't tell us anything about the original source/copyright holder. January (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Tarantulas Monster Wave 100 Feet High Album Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: album cover in the article about the group, see footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Tarantulas cover art and liner notes for the album "Greatest Hits or The Big Sellout".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: album cover in the article about the group, see footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TeenAIDS-PeerCorps Organization Button Logo.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3b. Tagged for reduction since October, but no attempts have been made to correct the policy violation. As a violation of WP:NFCC#3b, we can't keep this high-resolution copy. Stefan2 (talk) 13:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also fails 3a on account of there being another non-free logo in the article (File:TeenAIDS-PeerCorps website logo.png), both are claimed as "the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question". Either this one should be kept and rescaled and File:TeenAIDS-PeerCorps website logo.png deleted, or it should be deleted and the other one moved to the infobox. January (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anberlin Devotion Deluxe.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:Anberlin Devotion Album Cover.jpg, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SW Logo Black no symbol.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{PD-textlogo}}. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NYC Montage 2014 3 - Jleon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, redundant to Commons:File:NYC Montage 2014 4 - Jleon.jpg. The whitespace between the images is slightly smaller, making this ineligible for F8. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is a minor difference but uploader requested deletion som no need to keep it. --MGA73 (talk) 20:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baby gusty.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what purpose this image is supposed to serve. Looks like vandalism, but I might have misunderstood something. Certainly not related to the Seventh Doctor. Stefan2 (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Five Ancestors Kung Fu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vonta Leach Ravens Picture 2013-2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MER-C (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two copies of the same file: one free and one unfree. No evidence of permission. Fails WP:NFCC#1 if unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. While tagged as free, both are sourced to espn.com and would be replaceable. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mississippi 2012 Presidential Election.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient source to determine that the image actually comes from Wikipedia. There is also no evidence that the image has been released to the public domain. Many files on Wikipedia require attribution. Also low quality without foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.