Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 May 7

< May 6	May 8 >

May 7

File:PowerglideInsert.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR: front cover is adequate for identification and this is not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The image of the album insert artwork is discussed in the article, in the section Powerglide (album)#Artwork. This is mentioned in the "Purpose of use" section of the fair use rationale for the image. — Mudwater^(Talk) 05:13, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This file fails WP:NFCC#8 because it does not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic" i.e. the album itself, and omitting it from the article would not "be detrimental to that understanding". It also fails WP:NFCC#3a because the article already contains an unfree file in the infobox (File:NRPS Powerglide.jpg). Green Giant (talk) 12:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The letter for collecting fresh human organs to dalai lama 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused media, suspected defamatory fabrication , original uploader was seemingly banned as an SPA. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the source is unverifiable because it appears to have been offline for several years. I don't thing we should necessarily give credence to what might or might not have been discussed on message board. There is no evidence that it is a genuine letter and the image is so faint that it is unlikely we will be able to verify that it does say what the summary claims. Perhaps the uploaders English wasn't the best but the wording seems very poorly translated. Additionally the uploader has been blocked for defamation. All in all, I cannot see a good reason to keep this image. Green Giant (talk) 12:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WendyAndLisaSouthPark.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Failure of WP:NFCC#8. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How does it fail to explain significance? I've added more details that should help further explain its importance. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, just some entirely stereotypical Southpark figures; nothing in the article that couldn't adequately be understood without this visual support. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe just a photo of Lisa herself would be better? It's hard to describe her adequately without pics. It only makes sense to include her since this is the episode she was first seen in (since Season 18 of South Park hasn't started yet, too soon to say if she'll return, though at the same time too soon to say if this shall be her only appearance) XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 09:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- "Hard to describe her adequately"? For heaven's sake, she just looks exactly like all other Southpark figures. They have virtually no individual features anyway. Here's a full, adequate description: the uniform round Southpark face plus red-brown hair, glasses and something that looks like freckles. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds rather oversimplified. Eric Cartman is a perfect example of how they aren't all alike even in basic form. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 09:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article is essentially about body image and the use of Photoshopping, for which a relelvant image might be one that shows "Lisa" before and after "photoshopping". As it stands this file fails WP:NFCC#8 because it shows the two cheerleaders talking but that is not a critical part of the article. Green Giant (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.