Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 September 13

< September 12	September 14 >

September 13

File:Athadu Audio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Opposing it as the cover is not identical with the poster and the cover in turn features the lead pair. Thus it is not an additional image being used which can be considered extraneous. With reference to many such cases esp. in Hindi and Tamil film articles, i oppose the file's deletion. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are confusing WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack with WP:NFCC#3a. This is not an article about the soundtrack, and a picture of the soundtrack is not needed to understand what the film is about. --13:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ORCCE coat of arms.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a coat of arms. The image therefore violates WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Transdev logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as this is the current version of the logo, it should be used instead of older versions. TLSuda (talk) 15:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFC#UUI §17. File:TransdevMIBY.svg is used instead in the only article where the image is appropriate. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you bothered to look at when File:Transdev logo.svg was uploaded, you'll note that it was in 2013 and File:TransdevMIBY.svg was in 2014 and is uploaded at a larger size. Bidgee (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for two copies of the same file. Also, this is a textbook violation of WP:NFC#UUI §17: the logo should only be used in the article about the parent entity (Transdev) but not in articles about child entities such as Transdev NSW. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Rejecting Stefan2's argument, as the file is used on several other relevant articles. If the newer logo is appropriate for those, please check, then replace this old one, and then suggest it for the chop. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. How stupid! Why does everybody need to upload their own version. Is it conceit? We only need one, and any inferior versions or duplicates should be superceded. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.