Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 March 11

< March 10	March 12 >

March 11[edit]

File:Benjamin Orr (The Cars).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion here : Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#File:Benjamin_Orr_.28The_Cars.29.jpg :"This looks like an NFCC#2 failure. Image is by pro photographer Ebet Roberts and licensed through Getty Images (see here) " So this looks like it was copyrighted by Getty and fails NFCC#2 "Respect for commercial opportunities. Non-free content is not used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted material." Gaff (talk) 02:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Confederation of African Rugby (logo).png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant extra logo, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anjelah Johnson comedy.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - I have taken the time to watch enough of the video. The assertion this is self-made is unsupportable - Peripitus (Talk) 11:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Screen capture from her special "The Homecoming Show". Not free. Artifacts make it clear it is a capture. She is still living, invalid for Fair Use as well. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

well excuse me for having a crappy camera to my use at the time, I was physically there so it should count. I did tweak it using an image enhancer so my apologies if it looks like I was just sitting in front of a screen and took a picture.Mcelite (talk) 18:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does look like a tv camera angle (I'm not disputing what you said - just saying that I understand the source of Dennis Brown's assumption). Based on your statement here, and on File:Anjelah doing a skit.png, which clearly is not a tv angle keep. --B (talk) 01:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bunk. Go look at the video, this is exactly the camera angle used for several shots throughout the special, just verified again on the actual video at 25:06. Anyone with Netflix can view it. Haven't found the exact frame, but that isn't necessary, only demonstrating the camera angle is. If he took that shot, then the video camera would have a shot of the back of his head. This image is a crop. The artifacts don't lie, nor does the actual angles shown in the actual show. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I wanted to note that the color matching is entirely perfect between the actual video and this image, something no still camera, cheap or otherwise, would accomplish. Looking at the actual video makes it obvious on all fronts. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I still took the picture and I used movie maker and another program to zoom in as I said I did alter the original picture. That's all I did but whatever, tired of this trolling as if I ripped it from some stuck up professional photographer.Mcelite (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resorting to ad hominem ("trolling") isn't making your case. Efforts to undermine my opinion by calling my motives into question are likely to fall on deaf ears. I welcome any other graphics professional with access to the original video to make their own comparisons, as I did. As I have well over two decades experience in the field, I'm inclined to trust my own experience and judgement when it comes to imaging. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do as you please already to you I did alter the original. Que sera seraMcelite (talk) 03:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.