Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 31

< July 30	August 1 >

July 31[edit]

File:728x90B.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: 'Delete' as no evidence of permission exists. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:26, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a banner ad for reddit.com, I am not sure how this can be under GFDL. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Leader2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image with dubious encyclopedic value. It is not clear what it is showing. Thus, it cannot go on Commons. (Violates their project scope policy.) Image description suggests this file is uploaded solely for external usage, with Wikipedia serving as a hosting service. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MattYoungFootballer.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Was tagged for F4, uploader says they've now added a source and copyright, but I still don't see a license tag. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the source and copyright.

Please email for confirmation/licensing/proof. Many Thanks

Pedro888 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro888 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have to provide it on Wikipedia first Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St lawrence church 1830.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as superseded Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed to be superceeed by image at Commons as detailed on file description page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RickRescola 140x190.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derived image from file deleted for lack of licensing information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Westpeak02.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upload by blocked user, so can't ask them to confirm it's own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per File talk:Westpeak02.jpg and no reason to doubt own work status or the license tag. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sepans.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, user profile photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LST Sicily.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At Commons, but commons image is lower quality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. It was clearly a misfired transfer. Someone had downloaded the thumbnail instead of the full resolution. But it was clearly a transfer still, because {{PD-Canada}} on Commons also had |commons, which suggested copy and paste. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

F8 ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. —Codename Lisa (talk) 17:52, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Psyface.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, no context given to evaluate for Commons suitability.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.