Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 November 3

< November 2	November 4 >

November 3[edit]

File:KITS 1053 Dave FM.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image only contains simple text and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. License should thus be changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:550F:ABD8:5D19:EDB1 (talk) 02:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to pd-logo and copy to Commons. Salavat (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fish Hooks logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image only contains simple text and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. License should thus be changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. 2600:1700:9DD0:8FD0:550F:ABD8:5D19:EDB1 (talk) 03:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to pd-logo and copy to Commons. Salavat (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raghu4.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photo, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗plicit 06:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diva-exchange-owl.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The artwork of the owl is too complex to be "simple geometric shapes", so the tagging of this as PD-textlogo is not accurate. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 13:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free file with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FSN Chicago (2004-2006) logo.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Replaced with vector version. ✗plicit 23:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image only contains simple text/shapes and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. License should thus be changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. 107.134.86.17 (talk) 15:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to pd-logo and copy to Commons. Salavat (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've replaced the logo with File:FSNChicago.svg on Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eardley Norton at the Madras High Court.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in India. Needs evidence the painting is old enough to be in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo for Avonmore.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Now in use. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo unsuitable for Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I found a use for the logo in Glanbia Co-operative Society Limited. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.