Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 October 31

October 31[edit]

File:Nasir Gondal.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via WP:VRT 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Super Mario Clouds.gif[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. None of the respondents think that deletion is what needs to be done, and no one has made an argument against the fair use rationale. (non-admin closure) —Alalch E. 16:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The artwork itself is a copyvio of Super Mario Bros. sprites. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 11:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the artwork's copyright state, our illustration of it is within the listed fair use license. czar 11:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The image is shown as fair use, not in Wikipedia Commons. It would be a copyvio if it was listed under a free license. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LibertyGrove,NorthEntranceSign.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo for Palace of Versailles.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an appropriate file for fair use, per WP:NFCC#8, which states that the file must: "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". This logo does not accomplish this, as we can just show the picture of the building itself, as we do in all other articles about buildings or structures. Bestagon ⬡ 20:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shani Louk in Gaza City.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 November 9. Whpq (talk) 02:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shani Louk in Gaza City.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.