Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Keep Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
So I reviewed this article under an old username five years ago, and I rubber stamped it as I thought there were no issues. The me five years ago was also not aware of the whole section describing each deck used close paraphrasing in its entirety. Personally, I am not sure this article still passes the GA criteria with a large part of the material gone, so this is why I'm starting a community reassessment. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Just to add on which criteria the article doesn't meet anymore is 3a, which is "address the main aspects of the topic". Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- I was shown what was removed and replaced it with information from one of the existing references. Thegreatdr (talk) 02:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Main problem of the article has been resolved, will wait for one week to see if anyone else has found an issue with the article. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 03:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging Chlod for input. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 05:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like Thegreatdr was able to properly replace the given section and there seems to be no copyright issues left. However, I'm still new to the required amounts of content in good articles, so whether or not the added content is enough to replace the old one (which had three paragraphs) is what I'm unsure of. I'll probably leave that decision to someone with better reviewing skills than me. Chlod (say hi!) 09:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Back when this article was submitted for GA, there was no specific size requirement for such. If there is nowadays, it would be good to know what that value is. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- There isn't; the content just has to be good. And since everything here seems to be resolved... –♠Vami_IV†♠ 21:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Back when this article was submitted for GA, there was no specific size requirement for such. If there is nowadays, it would be good to know what that value is. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like Thegreatdr was able to properly replace the given section and there seems to be no copyright issues left. However, I'm still new to the required amounts of content in good articles, so whether or not the added content is enough to replace the old one (which had three paragraphs) is what I'm unsure of. I'll probably leave that decision to someone with better reviewing skills than me. Chlod (say hi!) 09:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging Chlod for input. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 05:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Main problem of the article has been resolved, will wait for one week to see if anyone else has found an issue with the article. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 03:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- ...I am voting to keep this article a GA. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 21:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Closing as keep. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)