Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/FLCL/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Keep Doesn't provide ny details on why this fails the GA criteria AIRcorn (talk) 05:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't really tell that much about the development of FLCL, although the article has images that help understand the subject, it's very basic and more like b-class article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eltomas2003 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Converting this to a community reassessment; first poster is too new to editing and to the GA process to do a reassessment per the GA criteria; there are no specifics given, and the comment wasn't even signed. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)