Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 December 23
December 23
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The_State_Funeral_of_Dr._T_E_Donges_03Jan1968.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hilton1949 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, likely unfree. Kelly hi! 01:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: What happened to assuming good faith? "Likely" is a step too far. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 22:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Why are there two deletion tags on this image? --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 22:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The duplicate tag was an error on my part; the Dec 7th tag was added, but the image was never added to the log that day -- When I noticed it was not added, I started the nomnation again. I thought I had removed the duplicate tag -- I have done so now.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Why are there two deletion tags on this image? --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 22:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likley used on deleted article per talk page Jordan 1972 (talk) 03:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned & self promotional. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: That seems to be the case. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, likely used on deleted article per users talk page Jordan 1972 (talk) 03:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned & self promotional. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if he is absent. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo, likely used on deleted article per users talk page Jordan 1972 (talk) 03:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned & self promotional. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, if he is absent. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I2 by Jclemens (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Als0605 in June 2008 output1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Als0605 (notify | contribs).
- Unused random image. MBisanz talk 05:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Don't Billy Currington single.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Holiday56 (notify | contribs).
- low quality, not the official cover it's just a picture of the artist, same exact photo was deleted in November for the same reason Caldorwards4 (talk) 05:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete if it was deleted before. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, self-made BBC icon Skier Dude (talk) 07:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, sounds like a breach of copyright. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Baluchistan wf mw.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Balochistangovernment (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, possibly intended for Balochistan (region) but animated .gif is UE for this Skier Dude (talk) 07:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Baluchistan mwg.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Balochistangovernment (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, possibly intended for Balochistan (region) but animated .gif is UE for this Skier Dude (talk) 07:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More football kit orphans
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted Skier Dude (talk) 23:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
A few more unused football kits Skier Dude (talk) 08:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blessed Bulls Team Colours.png - File:Glosbodyh07.PNG - File:Greece home.PNG - File:Image-Kit body ManUtdHome.png - File:Kit body dvtk.png - File:Mtsample28.PNG
- Delete, surely these can be created the usual way? --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Blinkensisters monster3.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cavac (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ChiefMasterSergeant.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Airforceprepclubwchs (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article Air Force Preparatory Club does not exist Skier Dude (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete until it does. If it's as big as it claims to be it should be easily located again. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dogma free america.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Richorman (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete orphans. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't even see it! --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:49, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I don't get it. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, how strange... --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, ought to come with a warning sign for epileptics! --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gifwiki.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Uahygcfr Fordingham (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, blurred image, too small to be of encyc. use Skier Dude (talk) 08:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Cannot be seen. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Glass break thumbnail.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Trevorcox (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Globulo rojo small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cuervonhmss (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned userbox image Skier Dude (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if the project it claims to represent do not respond. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, small & blurred image, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, small & blurred image, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, small & blurred image, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gradient left red1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Benlisquare (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems pointless. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Grue Jammy.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ShandraShazam (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems pointless. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 23:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gtaganxtaizesig.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by GTA Ganxtaize (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, apparently intended for signature Skier Dude (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, practically invisible. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Guitar Hero Explorer Icon.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bass Speaker III (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Seems it would be non-free. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gunzgunzgunz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Panicathedisco (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HD Symbol.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fightingirish (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Miniscule. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HR Small Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chickenwing hall (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Habbies.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Habsfannova (notify | contribs).
- orphaned userbox image Skier Dude (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hail shower (day).gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hail shower (night).gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hail.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hammered-finish-hammered-bangle-navania.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cobaltblue1972 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (source link is dead) Skier Dude (talk) 08:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Happy face1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Monbannana61 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HabboRoom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Destructo 087 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Heavy rain shower (day).gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Heavy rain.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Heavy snow shower (day).gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Heavy snow shower (night).gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Heavy snow.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:High-polish-bangle-navania.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cobaltblue1972 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear (link provided is dead) Skier Dude (talk) 08:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hju.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Self Preteder (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hn1.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mc hammerutime (notify | contribs).
- orphaned userbox image Skier Dude (talk) 08:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned self-made logo, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Houstonwranglers.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dgreco (notify | contribs).
- orphaned user-made logo, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Logo is in use at Houston Wranglers. -- Eastmain (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could be in that article, but it isn't. Wim van Dorst (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hurricane ROX.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karax-Kyuzo (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, absent uploader, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:IUTD-logo v1.3 ava.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by P3ngu1n123 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Icecreamspoon.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tripodero (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jamaica flag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mike subritzky (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, animated .gif flag not proper for encyc. use Skier Dude (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JimmyCarterdonkeybarbwires.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TurtleShroom (notify | contribs).
- orphaned userbox image Skier Dude (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned stargage 'sigil' Skier Dude (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. PhilKnight (talk) 17:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned template image Skier Dude (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The image was orphaned due to a wikicode bug. I fixed this, and it is now again used at Da'at (on the {{sefirot}} template there.) --Eliyak T·C 15:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LANG-SP.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tv's emory (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 09:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 09:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LandRoverDiscoII.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wimvandorst (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear, too small to be of any encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 09:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to ifd, it's PD. Move it to commons and there's no problem. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is very low resolution, and the commons already has images such as this, so I don't think this is worth keeping. PhilKnight (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OK with Deletion This image was intended for the User Land Rover userbox. Since then, the picture has since been updated to another Land Rover, and the template has been moved to its current place. No need to keep this low-res picture. Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Letran colors.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Howard the Duck (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, superseded by .svg image Skier Dude (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mohammad salim khan 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Salimswati (notify | contribs).
- orphaned personal image Skier Dude (talk) 09:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 09:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Stifle (talk) 09:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image intended for personal pages Skier Dude (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this was mine an alternate username that is retired. I'd forgotten about it, but I'll pop a copy on Commons. It's just for personal use on talk page messages, but someone else may get use of it there. rootology (C)(T) 17:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Helena music video screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zntrip (notify | contribs).
- I feel that this image does not meet the requirements of WP:NFCC#8 as it does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its removal would not be detrimental to that understanding. It merely depicts a member of the band. The textual description currently found on the article is sufficient to describe the music video. Stifle (talk) 09:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Suspected copyvio. This photograph seems like a commercial/professional photograph and when one looks at the uploader's upload log, it seems clear that he's not very familiar with the concept of copyright, etc. This idea is reinforced when looking at his talk page. Anrie (talk) 09:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Krasue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Engsamnang (notify | contribs).
- Non-free screenshot used to illustrate an article on a mythological creature. The film this is taken from is mentioned only in passing. J Milburn (talk) 11:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The image is used in the article Krasue, about a mythological creature, to illustrate the concept being discussed. Appropriate application of a fair use claim. Nsk92 (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Image fails WP:NFCC#8. The image is not necessary to the understanding of the article. Text is sufficient to convey that he married Jane Fonda and they had a child. -Nv8200p talk 16:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The relationship is not discussed at any great length, and this image is not really telling us anything- it is purely decorative. Non-free image not required. J Milburn (talk) 12:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP: Image is central to public perception of Tom Hayden, and to popular history of the 1970's. Perhaps this aspect of article should be expanded. --Pete Tillman (talk) 12:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - image doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails NFCC8. Stifle (talk) 18:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Hayden's marriage to Honda is certainly one of the most notable things about him and the image, used in the Tom Hayden article, serves as an illustration of this significant aspect of Hayden's notability. I think this does get past the NFCC8 bar. Nsk92 (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. One does not need to see a photo of Hayden and Fonda to understand that they were once married. howcheng {chat} 17:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tom Hayden isn't an over-illustrated article. I agree it could use beefing up, and may get to it when I get over the flu. Also note this is an "almost free" photo, properly licensed for free Wikipeda use (but not for commercial reuse). Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 18:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it's not properly licensed for free Wikipedia use. Please read free content and this essay by the Deputy Director of the WMF for more information. howcheng {chat} 18:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He means that, legally, it is licensed for free Wikipedia use. However, the idea of some images being more free than others is not a good thing, as it makes it seem like some non-free content is more acceptable, some free content is less acceptable. The line in the sand has been drawn, so it's all or nothing now. J Milburn (talk) 23:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please reread WP:Non-free content and note that the policy is best treated with common sense and the occasional exception. Regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:01, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Technically, Howcheng is correct. The list of free licences is given at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses. The image in question is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 licence (by the UCLA library[1]). This is one of non-free forms of the Creative Commons licences, listed in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Deprecated, that allows free non-commercial use of the image, with proper attributions, but does not allow commercial use. In the formal sense, Wikipedia treats this kind of a licence in exactly the same way as a standard non-free commercial copyright. However, it is also true that if we wanted to use this image on Wikipedia, such usage would most certainly be authorized by its licence. There are two reasons why we try to restrict and discourage the use of non-free images. The first is potential legal problems with copyright owners who may contest the fair use claims. The second is a general desire to encourage distribution and creation of free content. The first reason is inapplicable in this case since, Wikipedia being a non-commercial organization, the image's use here is clearly authorized by its licence. The second reason, which is articulated in the essay Howcheng cited, is, of course, still applicable. I feel, however, that fair use claims for non-free Creative Commons licences may, on occasion, be treated a bit more leniently than fair use claims for ordinary non-free commercial copyrights. In this case the image is certainly not replaceable as Hayden and Fonda are no longer married and it is not likely that they are going to have such a picture-perfect family moment together as the one captured by this picture. While formally, of course, it is not necessary to see this picture to know that Hayden and Fonda were married, the image does make this much more tangible and real and has a rather unique feel to it that certainly adds encyclopedic value to the article. I would give it a pass for these reasons. Nsk92 (talk) 23:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As you know, the exclusion of this sort of imge from the WP definition of "free" continue to rankle many editors. But thanks for your support -- I think it's a pretty cool photo, too. Best regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure it does, but considering the m:mission statement explicitly names free licensing, there's not ever going to be any slack given on that point. howcheng {chat} 23:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please reread WP:Non-free content and note that the policy is "best treated with common sense and the occasional exception " Plus, it's a dumb policy, imo. Regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 02:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not an image worth such an exception. You can disagree all you want with the policy and the WMF's mission statement, but they ain't changing. howcheng {chat} 18:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I completely agree with Howcheng on this- this image needs to be treated as non-free. If we would not use an ordinary non-free image in this sense, we should not use this one like this. With such a strictly enforced policy, we need a very good reason to ignore it. J Milburn (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not an image worth such an exception. You can disagree all you want with the policy and the WMF's mission statement, but they ain't changing. howcheng {chat} 18:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please reread WP:Non-free content and note that the policy is "best treated with common sense and the occasional exception " Plus, it's a dumb policy, imo. Regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 02:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure it does, but considering the m:mission statement explicitly names free licensing, there's not ever going to be any slack given on that point. howcheng {chat} 23:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As you know, the exclusion of this sort of imge from the WP definition of "free" continue to rankle many editors. But thanks for your support -- I think it's a pretty cool photo, too. Best regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He means that, legally, it is licensed for free Wikipedia use. However, the idea of some images being more free than others is not a good thing, as it makes it seem like some non-free content is more acceptable, some free content is less acceptable. The line in the sand has been drawn, so it's all or nothing now. J Milburn (talk) 23:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it's not properly licensed for free Wikipedia use. Please read free content and this essay by the Deputy Director of the WMF for more information. howcheng {chat} 18:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've revised this photo's FUR to answer J Milburn's original complaint. I propose that the IfD be closed, and the image be retained. Pete Tillman (talk) 18:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The FUR was never the problem; it's how the image is used in the article. There is no text that simply needs to be illustrated in order to be understood. howcheng {chat} 21:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but... Whether the photo helps the article or not is a judgement call. So, let's take another look at the article, Tom Hayden. At present, there are 2 photos. The lead photo portrays a rather bilious Hayden, out of focus in a cluttered setting -- a mediocre amateur snapshot. The photo under discussion, taken by a professional photographer, is clean, sharp, and well-composed. It shows Hayden during his "15 minutes of fame", and reminds (or educates) the reader why he was a glamorous and controversial politician then. There's really no question which is the better photo, though both help the reader visualize the subject. To say (as in the original complaint for this IfD) that "this image is not really telling us anything- it is purely decorative" is, well, a dubious statement. In my judgment, the LA Times photo is a fine addition to our article, and there's no question it should be retained. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 01:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HSM3 normal DVD edition cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rogerchocodiles (notify | contribs).
- Basically the same as the other cover already in the article. Not required. J Milburn (talk) 12:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NFCC#3a. Stifle (talk) 18:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Non-free image in collage. -Nv8200p talk 15:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Welsh_Americans.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Crafanc (notify | contribs).
- The individual images for Anthony Hopkins and Jack Daniel are missing source and license information. Free images exist for them, so a new collage can be created. PhilKnight (talk) 15:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete With two missing images it's free-ness is in question.
- Comment Source line says:
- Source=Self-made using:<br /> [[Image:Frank Lloyd Wright LC-USZ62-36384.jpg|90px]][[Image:Lewis-Sinclair-LOC.jpg|65px]][[Image:Jack Daniel Statue|66px]][[Image:Abraham Lincoln head on shoulders photo portrait.jpg|74px]][[Image:James Abram Garfield, photo portrait seated.jpg|58px]][[Image:Bill_Evans.JPG|76px]][[Image:Thomas_Jefferson_rev.jpg|68px]][[Image:Hillary Rodham Clinton.jpg|68px]][[Image:Anthony Hopkins|68px]]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC#1. A free image could be created. -Nv8200p talk 16:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rakhshan_Bani_Etemad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BehnamFarid (notify | contribs).
- Living subject, so replaceable image. PhilKnight (talk) 16:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per WP:NFC, fair use claims do not apply to non-free images of living individuals in the articles about themselves. One should either find a free image or not have a photo at all. Nsk92 (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. The claim that the image at issue were non-free is utterly unfounded and is in fact false. As I indicated earlier, the photograph originates from a blog belonging to the daughter of Ms Rakhshan Bani-E'temad (i.e. Ms Baran Kosari), and there is no indication on this blog, whether explicit or implicit, that the image at issue were copyrighted. This is the source of the photograph. Please find a copyright statement on this source, and I shall withdraw my statement. Further, Nsk92 states that "fair use claims do not apply to non-free images of living individuals in the articles about themselves". Firstly, the image at issue is free (see above). Secondly, what is "themselves" supposed to mean? I have added the photograph, and not Ms Rakhshan Bani-E'temad! I maintain that the image at issue is free and serves a very useful purpose on Wikipedia; it should therefore be kept. I am absolutely dumbfounded by this apparently uncontrollable urge of some to delete whatever image (in particular when the image seems to be in a reasonable condition) that they encounter on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a demolition site! --BF 17:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As PhilKnight notes below, all images are presumed to be copyrighted until proved otherwise. What I meant by "themselves" is that it is not OK to use a non-free image of a living person in a WP article about that person. However it may be appropriate, under an appropriate fair use claim, to use a non-free image of a living person in an article about something else. E.g. in an article about some movie it may be OK to use a non-free image of a poster for that movie that portrays some actor playing a character in that move; while it would not be appropriate to use such a poster in an article about the actor himself. A good example is something like Four weddings and a funeral that has a poster with a picture of the actor Hugh Grant. It is fine to use that image in an article about the movie, but not in the article Hugh Grant. Nsk92 (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- To quote from the WP:COPYRIGHT policy: "Images and photographs, like written works, are subject to copyright. Someone holds the copyright unless they have been explicitly placed in the public domain." Unless you find or produce some proof that the image in question has been explicitly placed in the public domain, it is presumed to be copyrighted. Instead of going on angry tirades you should take your time to study the basic Wikipedia policies related to copyright issues. Nsk92 (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As PhilKnight notes below, all images are presumed to be copyrighted until proved otherwise. What I meant by "themselves" is that it is not OK to use a non-free image of a living person in a WP article about that person. However it may be appropriate, under an appropriate fair use claim, to use a non-free image of a living person in an article about something else. E.g. in an article about some movie it may be OK to use a non-free image of a poster for that movie that portrays some actor playing a character in that move; while it would not be appropriate to use such a poster in an article about the actor himself. A good example is something like Four weddings and a funeral that has a poster with a picture of the actor Hugh Grant. It is fine to use that image in an article about the movie, but not in the article Hugh Grant. Nsk92 (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the image was originally tagged as disputed fair use, and I brought it here so we can calmly discuss the situation, not trade insults. Firstly, images are presumed non-free until proved otherwise. Secondly, we generally don't use non-free images to depict living people. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It is not common practice to prove a negative. We do not go to the legal authorities every morning to prove that we did not commit the crimes committed the day before in our town or city; we, however, defend ourselves when accused of having committed a crime. We do not prove that 2 + 2 is not equal to 3, because having done so, we will have to prove that it is also not equal to 5, or 6, or 7, ad infinitum. If Ms Rakhshan Bani-E'temad does not wish her photograph to be used as free, then it is her responsibility to make sure that there is a copyright statement attached to her photographs (she is a professional film-maker, so she should know well how to protect her rights). Furthermore, you should realise that the Iranians living inside Iran in general do not respond to calls from the people whom they do not know personally and who moreover live abroad; the people contacting them might be on some black list, thus causing them all kinds of problems. I have for instance written to Ms Baran Kosari over two months ago, in connection with a pension fund that I have been trying to set up (for the artists of the older generation who have come to fall on hard times), and I have as yet received no response from her. In not responding, she has not been acting out of order: none of the ten or so active artists that I have written to has responded thus far (I have written to Ms Niki Karimi, Mr Shahab Hosseini, Mr Bahram Radan, Ms Golshifteh Farahani, Ms Leila Hatami, Mr Ali Mosaffa, etc., etc.). You will have to realise that should I turn out to have some links with some "undesirable" political organizations abroad, the mere writing of these people to me can cause them untold miseries. As it happens, I have no association with any political groups, whether desirable or undesirable, but how could these people know? They are left with one option: to play safe and not respond. Please take these basic facts into your consideration when demanding Herculean tasks from others. I have just spent too much of my precious time on arguing with the people (all like you) who seem to have no vision of the outside world beyond their computer screens. Please stop being so unreasonable! In the case at hand, wait until such time as Ms Rakhshan Bani-E'temad possibly writes to Wikipedia and explicitly protests against the exposure of the photograph at issue by Wikipedia. If you, all, are left with some free time (after having acted as public prosecutors, all related to some petty and materially worthless photographs), then you may start reading about the events taking place in the world outside your computer screens. I am deeply annoyed by this utter lack of understanding on the part of some of the Wikipedia editors. When do you want to stop causing so much material and psychological damage to me and my ilk? Do you know at all how the world works? It seems that you have no idea! If deleting Ms Bani-E'temad's photograph is the thing that gives you some special pleasure, then please go ahead and delete it right away. I have lost my patience with so much unreason and parochial attitude displayed so abundantly on Wikipedia! How many more hours, and countless more words, have I to spend on this utterly senseless business before you begin to even to consider to contemplate a bit? You all look like hardened fundamentalists to me, who have found the truth and the only truth (your "Bible" seems to be some Wikipedia rule book, which, incidentally, Nsk92 accuses me of not being familiar with; I must be a heretic here). Please, leave me in peace now! Thank you! --BF 08:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please read Wikipedia:Copyrights.
- Comment The picture is at http://i29.tinypic.com/20p5udu.jpg.
- Regrettable delete as the image does not comply with policy and guidelines for its current use. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Abdelrahman Mohamed CV HR final.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bido2000 (notify | contribs).
- Image is a PDF of a resume. I STRONGLY doubt that there is any relevant reason for this file to be on Wikipedia. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I8 by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FTC logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bee Cliff River Slob (notify | contribs).
- Redundant to File:US-FederalTradeCommission-Seal.svg, but not the same file format so doesn't qualify for CSD I1. It is also orphaned, and pretty broken as an image too. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete per consensus. -Nv8200p talk 16:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:I'm Not Okay (I Promise) alternate cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zntrip (notify | contribs).
- I am concerned that this image may not be usable under the non-free content criteria, specifically 3a (as multiple non-free images are being used when one would suffice) and 8 (as readers' understanding of the article would not be affected if the image were not included). Stifle (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — I believe this image is needed on this page, and that it complies with all the non-free use rationale guideline. Both album covers were used interchangeably when the single was released and one is only labeled as the alternative cover by chance. A reader is as likely to identify with as with the other. – Zntrip 18:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - in the context of another very similar image, this doesn't add much. PhilKnight (talk) 19:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the only difference from the "main" version is that this has black background instead of while, this difference can be adequately explained by text ("an alternative version of the cover with a black background was also used" or some such), making this a replacable non-free image that is not nessesary for understanding the article. --Sherool (talk) 22:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:NFCC3a, unnecessary duplication of essentially identical non-free image already used in the article. Nsk92 (talk) 18:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All has been said for this one. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DennyLaineReborn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sposato (notify | contribs).
- Non-free album cover used without any discussion of the album itself. howcheng {chat} 21:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per nom. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8. The image is not significant to the understanding of the article. -Nv8200p talk 16:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The_Eastman_Familyjpeg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andreasegde (notify | contribs).
- NFCC 8 violation. It is not necessary to see a picture of Linda McCartney as a child or her family. Adds little, if anything, to the article. howcheng {chat} 22:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Linda Eastman/McCartney's article is a biography. To not have a photo of her with her whole family is tantamount to erasing a very important part of her life. Very little is known about her before she met McCartney, and this photo should not be deleted, in my opinion.--andreasegde (talk) 15:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is that the photo's usage cannot be justified in the article. Please explain how the reader's comprehension of the text of the "Early years and photography" is impaired by the removal of the photo. howcheng {chat} 17:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would have thought "Early years" would have been enough. I have now split the section into "Early years", and then "Photography". I find the photo to be very relevant to the section, as it does deal with her years as a child. In all honesty, how many photographs have you actually seen of Mrs McCartney as a child? This was the only one I could find. It is informative, and improves the article, because of its relevance.--andreasegde (talk) 19:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is that there is no discussion of photo in the article itself such that you'd need to see the photo in order to understand the article. If you can add sourced commentary about the photo itself, I'll be happy to withdraw this. howcheng {chat} 18:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll do that, and I thank you.--andreasegde (talk) 18:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the references 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 refer to her upbringing and family.--andreasegde (talk) 00:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't meaningfully add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 16:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How can a photograph in a biography about a person's younger life not be meaningful? The person is deceased.--andreasegde (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm going to have to go with the nominator on this. If she were well known for what she looked like as a child, or if something else in the photo was relevant to what made her well known, then maybe it would be different. For example, if she won youth awards as a photographer, and the picture had her holding a camera or the photograph was one she took of herself. But even that would be a stretch. As it is, sorry. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "something else in the photo was relevant"?? It's her family. She was not only known as a photographer.--andreasegde (talk) 08:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't follow. Families are like belly buttons - we all have them. Well, most of us do. If this were Tiger Wood's father showing him how to swing a golf club, or this person's mom giving her her first camera or otherwise uniquely contributing to what she would later be known for in a way most families wouldnt', that might be worth something. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 10:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder how notable Cedar Creek, Texas is? Never mind, it's just another example of Wikipedia, and how it eats itself from the inside out.--andreasegde (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8. The image is not significant to the understanding of the article. -Nv8200p talk 16:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Linda_Eastman_McCartney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andreasegde (notify | contribs).
- NFCC 8 violation. Article does not discuss Linda McCartney's post-cancer diagnosis appearance in any way, so no photo of her from this time is necessary for reader comprehension. howcheng {chat} 22:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose This is a very rare photograph, and should not be deleted, as it shows Linda McCartney as she was shortly before her demise.--andreasegde (talk) 15:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As above, how is the reader's comprehension of the "Death" section of the article impaired by the removal of the photo? howcheng {chat} 17:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One, because it shows a victim of cancer, who was accepted as previously being attractive, but shows the signs of her fateful condition. Two, this sentence, "In January 2000, McCartney announced donations in excess of $2,000,000 for cancer research at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York and the Arizona Cancer Center in Tucson, where Linda received treatment. The centers received $1 million (£625,000) each," says a lot. The section and the photo deals with (albeit not primarily) cancer victims and the support they are given.--andreasegde (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As above, the problem is that there is no discussion of photo in the article itself such that you'd need to see the photo in order to understand the article. If you can add sourced commentary about the photo itself, I'll be happy to withdraw this. howcheng {chat} 18:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll do that, and I thank you.--andreasegde (talk) 18:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the references 4,34, and 40 refer to her death.--andreasegde (talk) 00:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't meaningfully add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 16:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How can a photograph in a biography about a person's later life before her untimely death not be meaningful? The person is deceased. I always read that articles should be illustrated. Does this mean one photo of Mrs McCartney in her 20s? I despair...--andreasegde (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This photo could replace the one in the infobox, but both are not needed. The one in the infobox has the advantage that she's carrying a camera, an emblem of what she is known for. The 2nd adult picture doesn't say much more than the first, except maybe that she likes flowers and she has a different hairstyle. If you have a picture of her doing cancer-advocacy work, a picture of her on her deathbed, or a picture from her memorial service, those might be appropriate for this section. Of course, any illness- or death-related pictures should have the family's blessing before uploading, for WP:ITSONLYDECENT reasons if nothing else. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "a picture of her on her deathbed"?? I give up, and what a very tasteless comment to make.--andreasegde (talk) 08:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A picture on her deathbed that was released without her family's blessing would indeed be tasteless. However, one that was publicized by the family would not necessarily be tasteless and, depending on the surrounding text, could easily be encyclopedic. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 10:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There I was thinking that articles should be illustrated. It's my mistake, because I don't like reading black & white instruction manuals. Such is life...--andreasegde (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SloppyJoeConstructionAtSouth_Orange'sTownHallDeli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SloppyJoeSO (notify | contribs).
- Not used, don't think it's particularly ensyclopedic (we are not a cookbook), also looks like it might be a colage of screencaps rater than a series of photos by the author. Sherool (talk) 22:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stephanie_Ward.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stephanie_Ward (notify | contribs).
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 23:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo. Absent uploader. Sherool (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyivio, uploader claim this is his work released to public domain, but clearly taken from http://owens2008.com/home/about-robert/ The site carry the notice "© 2008, Robert Owens for Ohio Attorney General", yeah it's encouraged to share it, but no indication that any copyrights have been released. Sherool (talk) 23:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not used (assosiated article is deleted), also no source info. Sherool (talk) 00:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete then. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Submachine_gun_Mors.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nemo5576 (notify | contribs).
- Sourced to the Polish Wikipedia where the image appears to have been deleted for lack of evidence that it was public domain. Sherool (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete then. --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 00:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.