User talk:Robko71

License tagging for Image:Hitachilogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hitachilogo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:U106.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:U106.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:U106.gif is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:U106.gif itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EX5500.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EX5500.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rjgodoy 05:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:106.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:106.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, Robko71 , and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the simplified ruleset. Of the many ways to get help on Wikipedia, I personally recommend our wiki-boot camp, where you can chat online with fellow Wikipedians willing to help, or see some of the resources on WP:Wc!

Please feel free to ask me any questions you may have, on my talk page - I'm happy to help.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Introduction - quick steps to help you get started.
Questions - a guide on where to ask questions.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars - our most important rules.
Cheatsheet - quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

How you can help:

Contributing - a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal - Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes(~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). Or use the button, on the tool bar.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
If you'd like to meet other new users, be sure to visit our new user log.

Good luck, and have fun. -- Countincr ^{( T@lk )} 01:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:UH03.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:UH03.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AH400.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AH400.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 01:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)

Hi there, I thought you might want to take a look at the Manual of Style with relation to wikilinking. Currently, Hitachi Construction Machinery seems to be very overlinked--a good rule of thumb is to only link to words that are clearly related to your subject...so compact excavators would be a good choice to link and people and world are not necessarily to be linked to. Thanks for taking a look, and otherwise the article is very informative!--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 00:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hitachilogo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hitachilogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in HITACHI EG70R

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HITACHI EG70R, by RobDe68, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HITACHI EG70R is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HITACHI EG70R, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate HITACHI EG70R itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in HITACHI AH500-D

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HITACHI AH500-D, by RobDe68, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HITACHI AH500-D is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HITACHI AH500-D, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate HITACHI AH500-D itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in HITACHI EH1100-3

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HITACHI EH1100-3, by RobDe68, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HITACHI EH1100-3 is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HITACHI EH1100-3, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate HITACHI EH1100-3 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in HITACHI CS125C

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HITACHI CS125C, by RobDe68, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HITACHI CS125C is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HITACHI CS125C, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate HITACHI CS125C itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hitachi Construction Machinery

A tag has been placed on Hitachi Construction Machinery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RobDe68 02:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hitachi HR320G

A tag has been placed on Hitachi HR320G, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RobDe68 02:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HITACHI HX99B

A tag has been placed on HITACHI HX99B, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RobDe68 02:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam deletion

I'm taking notice of the above warnings and deleting many of the articles you created which are quite clearly promotional in nature. I am also going to delete most of the images you uploaded because they have been tagged as released in the public domain whereas they most clearly are not and are simply taken from Hitachi's website. This is not a personal crusade against Hitachi but advertising is unacceptable on Wikipedia. Thank you, Pascal.Tesson 02:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HITACHI LX300-7A

A tag has been placed on HITACHI LX300-7A, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RobDe68 02:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HITACHI HX99B

A tag has been placed on HITACHI HX99B, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RobDe68 02:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your article creation

A tag has been placed on Hitachi Construction Machinery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Will (aka Wimt) 02:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://spam.hitachi-c-m.com

related additions http://spam.hsc-crane.com
Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd Hitachi Construction Machinery

Spam sock accounts

Robko71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. --Hu12 18:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HCM article

Hello. This is a somewhat complicated situation. I have to agree that the main article was not so bad and it probably wouldn't have suffered the same fate had you not been the creator of a dozen other pages related to the company's products and which most clearly were written as or copied from advertisements. I have to assume that you work for the company's public relations because your edits have clearly shown an effort to promote the company. All the images which you uploaded were taken directly from the company's website and in some cases in resolutions which were higher than the ones available on the website which means that you probably have access to pictures not available to the general public. Moreover, you tagged all these pictures as if you were the owner of the images. Nevertheless, these pictures are still copyright (as clearly indicated on the website) and Hitachi can't have it both ways: if it wants these pictures on Wikipedia it will have to announce on the website that these pictures are released under GFDL.

Now back to the main problem: as an employee of this corporation, you are under a conflict of interest when writing the article. This is not an ideal situation as I'm sure you can appreciate and it is difficult to hope that you will be able to maintain a neutral point of view in the article. Moreover, Wikipedia is not a place where public relations departments can find free ad-space. Of course there probably should be an article about the company on Wikipedia because it is fairly well-known and there probably are plenty of reliable third-party sources to cite when writing about it. I'm afraid however that we'd need to find editors unrelated to Hitachi in order to write this up properly.

Best, Pascal.Tesson 01:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. As you can probably appreciate, Wikipedia's coverage of businesses always faces this complex problem. The first key to a good article is one or more dedicated editors willing to spend time to move the article forward but we also need them to have an independence from their subject. Of course, there is and always will be people from big companies that keep a close eye on the article and many such articles have recurrent problems of objectivity that unfortunately undermine Wikipedia's core objectives. It is a complex fight and I'm sure Wikipedia hasn't yet found the best solutions to win it. But in cases such as yours, it's tempting to overreact and throw the baby out with the baby water. Personally, I'd rather have no article than one whose objectivity I'm not confident about. Best, Pascal.Tesson 02:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:200LC.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:200LC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MER-C 06:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:De-Mining.jpg

I have tagged Image:De-Mining.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 11:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EH5000.jpg

I have tagged Image:EH5000.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 12:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IbarakiMap.jpg

I have tagged Image:IbarakiMap.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 12:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:TsuchiuraLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:TsuchiuraLogo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:USLC-3.jpg

I have tagged Image:USLC-3.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 12:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ZX350LC.jpg

I have tagged Image:ZX350LC.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 12:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hitachilogo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hitachilogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:EG70R.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EG70R.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know and so not to spam you with lots of template notifications, I've nominated a large number of your images for deletion at PUF, you can find them here. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 07:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hmono.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hmono.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 07:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa

Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabelldoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahfafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]