Wikipedia:Peer review/Meteorology/archive1
Appearance
I have requested a peer review to try to improve this article greatly. It needs considerable work that should be specifically identified. CrazyC83 19:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- This is just my observations and thoughts after a quick read over.History should be written out as an article rather then a timeline list. Save that for the main article Timeline of meteorology. I think the templates for links to other pages should go at the bottom of the page before the category listing. Institutions could be split from this article and placed on its own page. --Pinkkeith 19:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
This article is in serious need of inline references. How did it ever get rated B class? Thegreatdr 12:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)