Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Peer review/Taj Mahal/archive2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because its a GA now and I would let it go loose for FA. It had a PR ages ago (in 2006) and its a GA for about 6 years. Of course, there is no question about notability which have about 6-7K hits daily.

Thanks, Ṫ Ḧ the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Csisc

[edit]

First, I thank you for the work you have done about Taj Mahal. However, in order to get FA Status, the work must be more efficient and precise.

  • Celebrations: The work does not include any use of the Taj Mahal in celebrations... The most important place in India may host some events.
  • Origin and Inspiration: This section is excellent... However, you may include the cause of the important circumstances of the death of Mumtaz Mahal
  • Place: you may also include how the place in which Taj Mahal had been built was before 1632.
  • History: you should include which mosque from Cairo influenced the work. You should also expand the part talking about the situation of Taj Mahal during the British Protectorate in India
  • Threats: Taj Mahal had been threatened several times before 1943. I think you should expand the History Part and include threats in it.
  • Rehabilitations: I think that you should include that there are some rehabilitations of Taj Mahal that were done in order to preserve it.
  • Adjustments: You should also include whether the work had been adjusted later.
  • Tourism: The ads about visiting Taj Mahal should be also included. I think that the national trials to advertise and support the visits to Taj Mahal should be included.
  • Films and TV: I think that Films and TV shows turned in Taj Mahal should be included. As a national place, I think that many scenes had been filmed in the Taj Mahal areas.
  • Influence: I think that a part about how Taj Mahal influenced the creation of some artistic works should be included

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 09:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]