Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 12
March 12[edit]
File:August 28.jpeg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:August 28.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- orphan, bmp file, likely copyrighted and released without permission. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:BTullochGG.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BTullochGG.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Considering the statement of the uploader here: Talk:Bitsie_Tulloch, i doubt that this red carpet shot is made by the uploader. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:LizardRange2.jpeg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LizardRange2.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be an exact copy of the image available at http://bivouac.com/ArxPg.asp?ArxId=1549 RedWolf (talk) 03:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mabel Love 1905.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 21:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mabel Love 1905.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Mabel Love was a British stage actress, another Rotary Photographic Series postcard published in the UK (e.g. 1, 2, 3), no reason given that this would be PD-US. Kostelca (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Image from 1905. Fixed tag to {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Ssilvers. — BQZip01 — talk 18:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mabel Love.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 21:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mabel Love.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Mabel Love was a British stage actress, no reason given that this would be PD-US. Kostelca (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Image from c. 1904. Fixed tag to {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Ssilvers. — BQZip01 — talk 18:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Surdofox.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Surdofox.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly Album cover Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've replaced {{PD-old}} with {{Non-free album cover}}, as the latter is clearly appropriate. TNXMan 17:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Banco Largo 78 rpm 1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Banco Largo 78 rpm 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photograph of a record; unlikely uploader can claim copyright (ESkog)(Talk) 14:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Record was made in 1950+ (not in the US). Copyrighted. — BQZip01 — talk 18:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:VICTORY TISCHLER-BLUE 2010.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- According to the original upload, this is a copyrighted work and the uploader has not indicated they have received permission from Vern Evans to use this work. TNXMan 15:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:ChuckJeffreys.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ChuckJeffreys.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Was tagged with pending OTRS in november, but nothing happened since. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Dil.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dil.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence of permission, public domain claimed and yet on commons the comment is there PLEASE BE AWARE OF COPY RIGHTS. THE AUTHOR INFORMED THAT IT IS PROTECTED BY COPY RIGHTS. ANY MODIFICATION TO THIS MONOGRAME MAY CAUSE LEGAL ACTION Off2riorob (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File was uploaded by now indef blocked sock . Off2riorob (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:OGXCompany.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tnxman307 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OGXCompany.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Another improbable claim of user creation by Edson Rosa. He says he created the image and releases it to public domain but probably took it from an ODX company source such as this. Cnilep (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Now tagged appropriately. All it needs is a FUR, right? — BQZip01 — talk 18:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note the logo is no longer used, since I merged OGX to EBX Group. Cnilep (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, delete then as it is a non-free image that is no longer used. — BQZip01 — talk 18:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Logo even.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 21:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Logo even.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Another improbable claim of user creation by Edson Rosa. He says he created the image and releases it to public domain but probably took it from a company source such as this. Cnilep (talk) 17:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 3 circles + 1 square + text = retag {{pd-textlogo}} and {{trademark}}. — BQZip01 — talk 18:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed — BQZip01 — talk 18:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:CTEEPBrand.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, solution applied. After Midnight 0001 21:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CTEEPBrand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Another improbable claim of user creation by Edson Rosa. He says he created the image and releases it to public domain but probably took it from a company source such as this. Cnilep (talk) 17:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Listen, I agree he didn't create it, but he did upload a useful image that just needs to be fixed. 2 squares + text = retag {{pd-textlogo}} and {{trademark}}. — BQZip01 — talk 18:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed — BQZip01 — talk 18:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.