Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 27
September 27[edit]
File:MurrielPage.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MurrielPage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative image of the jumbotron footage. Photographer does not own the rights to this image. Mosmof (talk) 02:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Rao Tula Ram.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rao Tula Ram.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I highly doubt the uploader is the (c) holder of Indian stamps Skier Dude (talk 05:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: this 2001 Indian stamp is still in copyright because Indian stamps are copyright for 60 years per commons:Commons:Stamps/Public domain templates. This image is a WP:F9 speedy candidate, just like the identical image File:2017 Rao Tula Ram.jpg uploaded by the same editor that was deleted for the same reason yesterday, because it is clearly a copyright violation. ww2censor (talk) 12:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:HandmadeHouse cover.web.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- album cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 05:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
--
From my talk page--
Regarding the "Handmade House" album cover image. It is copyrighted. We own the rights, etc.
Please let me know if you have further questions...
Thanks, ArkSon —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArkSon (talk • contribs) 11:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
--
All claims of ownership need to be proved through WP:OTRS Skier Dude (talk 01:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Jade-mask-1.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jade-mask-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo not "100y PMA" as claimed here. Couldn't find any source info at http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/mayan-masks.htm or licensing info anywhere on http://www.latinamericanstudies.org Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Elsa Kazi.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Elsa Kazi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image long predates the upload date and there is no provenance given. Appears to be a publicity shot rather than a personal photo. Note that a smaller version of this was previously deleted after a deletion nomination Peripitus (Talk) 12:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Several other images from the same uploader regarding Imdad Ali Imam Ali Kazi's family have also been tag {{puf}} here--ARTEST4ECHO talk 18:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Mexican British People.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mexican British People.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
What is the source for each of the 8 images ? They appear to be taken from websites and the uploader is simply releasing the compositing as copyright subsists with the original creators. Peripitus (Talk) 12:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not only are the images most likely unfree, but a couple of the people pictured aren't even British. The person must assume that because they have modeled in the UK or played with the Premier League, it is enough to consider them British, but that is not so. -- Lancini87 (talk) 03:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 October 4#File:Italian Mexican People.jpg for more of the same from the same user. There is no source listed for any of the original images and a summary of "Photos of Mexican British" tells nothing about copyrights of the original images used in this derivative work. Uploader seems to have a history of copyvios and 'no permission' uploads. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Alfred matthews in film.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Claimed as uploader's own work, but title - "Alfred Matthews in film" - contradicts this. Since the title appears to be accurate, this is not a free image. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:03, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.