Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 July 26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
July 26[edit]
File:Literary Society KIMS Logo.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is logo artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:54, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Cover Letter KIMS Faraz.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This may not be entirely the uploaders own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Logo of VVMC Mayors Marathon.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a photo of a logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:07, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Salman Khan at IIFA June 2007.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- http://www.tineye.com/search/9fafbd8f43e5c557dac419b156416c913ec73933/?sort=size&order=desc - (first entry) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Colby college mule statue.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a photo of a sculpture. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Deniece Pearson singing live.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- no proof of ownership this maybe a copyrighted photo Redsky89 (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Five star 1987.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Five star 1987.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- this looks like a copyrighted image no proof that its the uploaders "own work" Redsky89 (talk) 19:49, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:14th IIFA Awards logo.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:14th IIFA Awards logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claims to be the author of this image. I find this dubious; it looks to be the official logo for the 2013 IIFA awards ceremony. At the very least it includes (and therefore is a derivative work of) the non-free official IIFA logo (the curvy shape resembling a Venus flytrap). Psychonaut (talk) 20:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Zenos Frudakis Reaching Indianapolis.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite the OTRS ticket, this is an image of a sculpture, which the OTRS ticket doesn't cover (see the deletion request at Commons.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep unless I misunderstand something. If I understand rightly, the photo is owned by the copyright holder for the sculpture, and he's given Wikipedia-acceptable permission for the photo via OTRS. As such, he's the only copyright holder for the image, and a proper release for the photo is all we need. The alternative to that is a claim that he's basically violated his own copyright! There's absolutely no reason to release the sculpture under a free license; all we need for a photo of a copyrighted subject is the photo's permission and the permission to use the image of the sculpture under the same permission. Only one person has copyright interests in this image, and unless I misunderstand something, he's permitted all uses of this image by anyone who follows GFDL. Nyttend (talk) 02:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The user who nominated this and the following for deletion on Commons is an OTRS member, so I would assume that he checked the OTRS ticket before nominating the files for deletion there. I've asked him to comment here. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Zenos Frudakis Payne Stewart Pinehurst.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS ticket only covers photo , not the artwork (see deletion request) at commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep unless I misunderstand something. If I understand rightly, the photo is owned by the copyright holder for the sculpture, and he's given Wikipedia-acceptable permission for the photo via OTRS. As such, he's the only copyright holder for the image, and a proper release for the photo is all we need. The alternative to that is a claim that he's basically violated his own copyright! There's absolutely no reason to release the sculpture under a free license; all we need for a photo of a copyrighted subject is the photo's permission and the permission to use the image of the sculpture under the same permission. Only one person has copyright interests in this image, and unless I misunderstand something, he's permitted all uses of this image by anyone who follows GFDL. Nyttend (talk) 02:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Zenos Frudakis MLKing Chester.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS ticket covers the photo, not the artwork(see Commons deletion request) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep unless I misunderstand something. If I understand rightly, the photo is owned by the copyright holder for the sculpture, and he's given Wikipedia-acceptable permission for the photo via OTRS. As such, he's the only copyright holder for the image, and a proper release for the photo is all we need. The alternative to that is a claim that he's basically violated his own copyright! There's absolutely no reason to release the sculpture under a free license; all we need for a photo of a copyrighted subject is the photo's permission and the permission to use the image of the sculpture under the same permission. Only one person has copyright interests in this image, and unless I misunderstand something, he's permitted all uses of this image by anyone who follows GFDL. Nyttend (talk) 02:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There's multiple copyrights involved with this picture. First is of course for the photo itself, then one for the sculpture, and one each for each of the photos displayed of MLK. Caffeyw (talk) 14:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- See also the similar discussion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 8#File:Zenos Frudakis Jack Nicklaus Louisville.jpg. That one closed as keep, but all files were deleted on Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There's multiple copyrights involved with this picture. First is of course for the photo itself, then one for the sculpture, and one each for each of the photos displayed of MLK. Caffeyw (talk) 14:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:The world's most northerly ATM machine.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Contains trademarked elements, so per comments on my talk page non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Trademarked elements are not a problem. The logo might be de minimis although I'm not sure. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you point to somewhere in policy that indicates that this is non-free because of a trademark? WP:LOGOS appears to mainly deal with when the image is a logo, not when it contains one, but it seems to indicate you can just slap on the {{trademark}} template in a case like this and move on, IRWolfie- (talk) 09:47, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Trademarks don't make anything non-free by default. See Commons:COM:NCR for the Commons explanation of this. The question is whether the logo is copyrightable (see Commons:COM:TOO) and/or de minimis. The nominator's deletion rationale is faulty. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Camel-lights-ua.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator. Note a previous discussion (July 9, 2013) resulted in Keep. Diannaa (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Camel-lights-ua.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is packaging artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment is the camel out of copyright? They've been using camels for a long time (brand introduced 1913) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:12, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment why is Sfan00 nominating this file for deletion at PUF TWICE this month? 2013 July 9. This is abusive. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:55, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep abuse of process, survived PUF just one week before being renominated for PUF. If you don't like it, use FFD. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the file is not tagged with a PUF template -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn Whcih is why it's not tagged currently.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Hershey's Cookies 'n' Creme Cereal.JPG[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is packaging artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to fairuse it is an image of the product -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.