Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 June 12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 12
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dug pond.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image by a Massachusetts state government agency, not the U.S. federal government, so copyright. —innotata 02:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep - cleaned up Diannaa (talk) 20:22, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The image terms of use at the source website permit re-use "for non-commercial personal, research, and study purposes only". This conflicts with both the licensing selected by the uploader and the image policy. SuperMarioMan 02:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A faithful reproduction of a 2 dimensional 1610 work, should just be tagged PD-OLD --Tony Wills (talk) 05:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A faithful reproduction of a 2 dimensional 1610 work containing images can also be tagged PD-Art|PD-old-100. So the image terms of use are not relevant. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CamdenSMarysLogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo artworks are not copyright exempt in the UK, and this logo
contains clear artistic choices. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- A political or election poster is not felt to be covered by the exemptions listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Iconic Warhol print, Can't see how this can be a self work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Emmy Awards 2011. Outstanding Sound Editing For A Miniseries, Movie Or Special. The Pillars of The Earth. Dominik Pagacz.jpg
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Emmy Awards 2011. Outstanding Sound Editing For A Miniseries, Movie Or Special. The Pillars of The Earth. Dominik Pagacz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source listed as Emmy Awards, but it's not clear if it's a user photo or not. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a user photo. Self-made by author as listed in comments. Free to use on wikipedia. What should have been the Source listing. Please advise. Thanks. logmaster34 23:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you saying that you took this photo? -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Correct. Logmaster34 (talk) 23:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Box cover art Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Tinucherian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Web resolution. No EXIF. I doubt the ownership claim. Sreejith K (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleted -- Tinu Cherian - 01:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tipping Point ITV.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Set Design, so this image is a derivative work of the set designer.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ndlicenseplate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Orphan image for North Dakota license plates. I can find no evidence that these plates are released in the public domain by the state (who would own the copy right). There is also a watermark for www.worldlicenseplates.com. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.