Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 13

December 13

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 13, 2010

MOS:DABCU

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 20:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DABCU → Category:Disambiguation pages in need of cleanup (links to redirect • history • stats)

"MOS:" redirect which does not redirect to a Manual of Style page. Mhiji (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Sofia Wilén

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Procedural close. There's already an open discussion about this on this page. Mhiji (talk) 23:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Wilén → Julian Assange (links to redirect • history • stats)

Was original in AFD, I closed that and moved it here since it belongs here. I have no opinion on this.. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Template, Australian federal election, full results, 2004

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted under CSD G6 by Athaenara. Non-admin closure by :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 22:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template, Australian federal election, full results, 2004 → Template:Australian federal election, full results, 2004 (links to redirect • history • stats)

Delete. Unused cross-namespace redirect. Unlikely typo. Mhiji (talk) 22:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Template/HD:Vet

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:R3. Airplaneman ✈ 23:13, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template/HD:Vet → Template:HD/Vet (links to redirect • history • stats)

Delete. Unused cross-namespace redirect. Unlikely typo. Mhiji (talk) 22:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Templates/IOC othergames/doc

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted under CSD G6 by Athaenara. Non-admin closure by :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 22:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Templates/IOC othergames/doc → Template:IOC othergames/doc (links to redirect • history • stats)

Delete. Unused cross-namespace redirect. Unlikely typo. Mhiji (talk) 22:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks like it's already been deleted. Not sure why it would need to be a redirect, for the same reason listed by Mhiji. Did I create this (can't check, since it's been deleted)? If so it was obviously back when I had no clue what I was doing. Donlammers (talk) 22:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

P:PR0N

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 18:53, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P:PR0N → Portal:Pornography (links to redirect • history • stats)

Delete. Unnecessary cross namespace redirect. Unlikely search term. Mhiji (talk) 21:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Glenfarclas (talk) 09:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Editing Template:Airports in Tunisia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted under CSD G6 by Athaenara. Non-admin closure by :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 22:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Template:Airports in Tunisia → Template:Airports in Tunisia (links to redirect • history • stats)

Delete. Unused, cross namespace redirect. Unlikely search term. Mhiji (talk) 21:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:KERFLUFFLE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Mhiji (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:KERFLUFFLE → Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (links to redirect • history • stats)

Apparently unused redirect to the admin incidents noticeboard (the only link is regarding the creation of this redirect, nothing else). Personally I don't see how the title of this redirect in any way is associated with the admin incidents noticeboard. Hey Mid (contribs) 11:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All I can recall about this RD is that there was some kind of joke (at which the edit summary hints) going on at the time about kerfluffles/fusses at ANI. Whatever I had in mind back then has long gone stale. Gone. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Round Maple, Babergh West SNT

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete this and just about all of the other redirects to Round Maple created by Crouch, Swale. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Round Maple, Babergh West SNT → Round Maple (links to redirect • history • stats)

Implausible search term - one of tens pointing to a highly obscure settlement Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 09:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep totally harmless. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 19:12, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pointless redirect to non notable place.--J3Mrs (talk) 19:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- But it's not doing any harm, why delete it?. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 19:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Because keeping it would encourage the creation of even more pointless redirects to non notable places that ought to be merged or deleted themselves.--J3Mrs (talk) 20:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - And what harm would that do? Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 20:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - And are you saying you think Round Maple should be deleted when it has had 1243 hits already this month (not including today), while Swilland, a reasonably sized village and civil parish only has had 36. Does that not tell you anything. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 20:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's over 34 times as many hits. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 20:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lies, damned lies, and statistics. The reason that Round Maple has had so many hits recently is because of the multitude of WP:RFDs and WP:TFDs associated with it in the past fortnight, plus the activities of the several editors who are monitoring/correcting your edits at the moment. Nancy ^talk 07:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But in November it had 1248, in October it had 894. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 09:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is about deleting the redirect. If traffic stats must be quoted at all (I question the value of this approach) then they should be those for Round Maple, Babergh West SNT. Nancy ^talk 09:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pointless, implausible redirect. Anyone looking for Round Maple (itself unlikely, as it is a dozen dwellings on a country road which even its own council's website doesn't mention by name) will type Round Maple. End of. Nancy ^talk 07:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Crouch, Swale. It's not doing any harm, it's not confusing anyone, it's not sending anyone to the wrong destination. Mhiji (talk) 07:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. What on earth does SNT stand for? It was this and Round Maple, Round Maple, Edwardstone that convinced me that Crouch, Swale was merely playing games with us. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Sofia Wilėn

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was

Relisted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 January 2. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Wilén → Julian_Assange#Alleged_sex_offenses) (links to redirect • history • stats)

Unnecesaary redirect, contravenes WP:BLP on several grounds. Redirect without the acute accent and the other woman in this case have been removed previously.

Could you specify how this contravenes BLP? Your statement is vague to say the least. Is this not the name of one of the women making accusations at Mr. Assange? Is that not already a matter of very public record? They even know her name in India:[1] so I think the cat is well and truly out of the bag regardless of what we do with this redirect. I would argue that the deleted redirects should be re-instated as it is likely readers (the persons we are trying to help by creating redirects) will come here looking for more information and will search these names. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:06, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The readers we are trying to attract will look up Assange first, WP:BLP1E is the most relevant reason to delete this redirect. It is difficult to take seriously a user named after an intergalatic confidence trickster. Philip Cross (talk) 09:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "the readers we are trying to attract". Do you mean to say there's a type of reader we are not trying to attract?--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the user's username have anything to do with this? Please no personal attacks. Mhiji (talk) 02:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-BLP1E would argue against an article on Willen herself, sure. However, a redirect to a section of another article covering the event for which she is notable is perfectly reasonable.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; consensus is currently to keep these names out of the article because they are of no particular interest or notability at this stage and BLP cautions us to exercise caution and restraint in naming people in these contexts. Nothing much is served by this redirect except to prove the point and subvert the consensus of not using the names at this stage. Can be easily recreated in the future if this individual becomes relevant (i.e. if it goes to trial) --Errant ^(chat!) 14:21, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The lost and found box

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Lost and found. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The lost and found box → Lost (TV series) (links to redirect • history • stats)

Vague redirect term for article, subject not even mentioned in target page. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 07:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Retarget to Lost and found or Delete as obscure synonym.--Lenticel ^(talk) 07:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Lenticel. Hey Mid (contribs) 21:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re-target per Lenticel --w^L^{<speak·check>} 01:44, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Lost and found per Lenticel. Glenfarclas (talk) 09:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Lost and found per above. Ng.j (talk) 13:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.