Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 29

October 29

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 29, 2013.

Machine-gun nest

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Defensive fighting position. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Machine-gun nest → Machine gun (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target article and thus of limited to no value. There was also no mention at the target article when the redirect was created. I can't conceive of a reader using this without knowing what a machine gun is. BDD (talk) 23:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Defensive fighting position. While it's not directly mentioned in the article, the article says that more complex and durable structures can house a machine gun crew. --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Henry Maidment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Maidment → Harold Maidment (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

No evidence the target has ever been known as "Henry Maidment" Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - article was at this title for over 4 years so deletion likely to break external links eg this one. This name used from time to time, eg [1][2]. We have no page on an another Henry Maidment so not confusing. The Whispering Wind (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It does not make any sense, though, so deletion is the best option. The fact that it was at this title for a while does not justify inclusion. It is confusing, as readers will have no idea why they wound up at this page. There is also an artist that has this name, so people may be looking for him and end up here for no reason. It's not harmless. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I take the point about the painter. I guess the best solution, if he is notable, which he may be, is creating an article on him with a hattnote. However, taking things as they are for now, since the incorrect name 'Henry_Maidment' is used on occaision then it becomes a plausible search term. Also, avoiding deletion that breaks external links is also a sound keep reason - WP:RFD#KEEP point 4. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's an unlikely (perhaps) although plausible search term that may have many links from the vast Internet. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 18:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disney Family Movies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Disney Channel#Other services. --BDD (talk) 00:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Family Movies → Video on demand (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Unuseful redirect for a VOD service, and Disney Family Movies Asia is unsourced. jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 09:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget ~~to Timeline of The Walt Disney Company~~ - though obviously the current redirect is a very poor target I think we need to keep a mention of this VOD service somewhere. It's already mentioned, with a couple of sources (and others are available), at Timeline of The Walt Disney Company and that seems fine for the moment. The content is currently in and out of Disney Channel (Asia) so, as a redirected article, outright deletion presents the usual GFDL problems. If the edit dispute going on results in the content being kept at Disney Channel (Asia) then we can retarget there but my suggestion provides useful information and holds the situation for now. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Disney Channel#Other services; service is American-centric and I can add on a quick line in that article to make it have a proper place. Nate • (chatter) 09:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Channel#Other services, with the addition of relevant content, is now a good target. The Whispering Wind (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Romanian Revolution

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by RHaworth. --BDD (talk) 05:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Romanian Revolution → Romanian Revolution (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

This WP:CNR created from a move error has resulted in a rater implausible search term. --BDD (talk) 23:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - un-needed and confusing. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
G6 Speedy Delete Standard procedure for such move errors. Such redirects can simply be tagged with {{db-g6|rationale= it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}, there's no need to bring them to RFD.

Wikipedia:Mfd#Before nominating a page for deletion states "Pages in the wrong namespace (e.g. an article in Wikipedia namespace), can simply be moved and then tag the redirect for speedy deletion using {{db-g6|rationale= it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}. Notify the author of the original article of the cross-namespace move.)". This is applicable to RFD as well. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 02:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Multiple redirects to Liberal eugenics

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 7#Multiple redirects to Liberal eugenics

MUltiple Redirects to Grodno Region

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 7#Multiple redirects to Grodno Region

No indication that this station provides any local content

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that this station provides any local content → Smile FM (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

This redirect should be deleted as the title has no direct relation to the network whose page it redirects to, and could be interpreted as a POV slam against the network. Tdl1060 (talk) 03:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this seems to be an inadvertently created article that was meant to be a talk page comment. The Whispering Wind (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was looking through the history of this redirect ... and ... well, it basically looks like one "oops" was turned into another "oops". Anyways, I agree to delete per all of the above. Steel1943 (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:41, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Talk page comment created as talk page heading accidently; no harm, no foul to delete this. Nate • (chatter) 09:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.