Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 10, 2021.

Þ̧

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 18#Þ̧

DKC TV cartoon.

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The full stop makes this a very unlikely search term UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Technological Liberation

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "liberation" at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:06, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; yes, "liberation" is not mentioned in the target: I wish creators of links like this would provide some justification for the link in their initial edit summary creating the link. ---Avatar317(talk) 00:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DList of Dragon Ball Z episodes (season 9)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very unlikely typo. Properly spelled List of Dragon Ball Z episodes (season 9) exists. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DONAL HENAHAN

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. plicit 01:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RCAPS UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for DONAL HENAHAN only. Donal Henahan's name is usually capitalized in print in The New York Times over his many decades as a writer; and many readers may copy paste his name into a search on wikipedia.4meter4 (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I agree with 4meter4 that if a name is used in all caps, that it would be plausible to copy-paste it to Wikipedia in all caps. I think WP:RCAPS actually supports this interpretation, namely When there is a connection between the subject and an alternative capitalization, it is usually kept. -- Tavix (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I’ve set up heaps of redirects in the format SURNAME, given name as that was the default for the FISA (World Rowing) database. Generally for Eastern European names where the English article name is different. Schwede66 19:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Edens Zero

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move has been reversed. No further action needed. —Kusma (𐍄·𐌺) 14:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The target page's title violates MOS:ALLCAPS guidelines and was created without discussion. This stylized capitalization is only used once within the article proper, while its regular spelling is used throughout the article and all links to the page. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 12:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:UC

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 18#Wikipedia:UC

Taper ratio

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Chord (aeronautics)#Tapered wing. signed, Rosguill talk 17:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The quantity is mentioned only in passing in the target, and is also mentioned in a totally different context in Space elevator. The original article was an unsourced, 2-sentence stub that fails WP:DICDEF and lacked context. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 16:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (talkwork) 05:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anthony Opoka

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 01:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by blocked UPE sockpuppet to promote Mulroy. This is the name of a person that has a passing mention in the target article, but does not seem to grant a redirect. MarioGom (talk) 13:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nasibi

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 01:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This term does not appear anywhere in the article, much less with a reliable source, so there is no context to its relationship to Shias and Sunnis. ... discospinster talk 16:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom due due to a lack of mention. I just read through the AfD, and I'm not sure I understand Eggishorn's !vote, which is how we ended up here in the first place. The entire !vote reads like one for deletion, yet they want it redirected despite there being no content worth preserving through a merge. So the can just got kicked down the road a bit to be dealt with at RfD... -- Tavix (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gents (Swedish band)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 01:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect target, a compilation album that one of this band's songs appears on, has now itself been redirected as non-notable. The band is not mentioned anywhere else on Wikipedia as far as I can tell, so these redirects should be deleted. Lennart97 (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.