Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2023 March 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< March 7 << Feb | March | Apr >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


March 8[edit]

Converting UTM coordinates to latitude and longitude[edit]

I figure I should start with the article I'm referencing. In particular, I'm looking at the last set of formulae in this article, to convert UTM to lat-long coordinates:

Universal_Transverse_Mercator_coordinate_system#From_UTM_coordinates_(E,_N,_Zone,_Hemi)_to_latitude,_longitude_(φ,_λ)

The formula has a few variables that are a mystery to me, particularly "j" and beta j. Can a math wizard walk me through this calculation? I'd like to create a script to generate lat-long coordinates from a pair of UTM coordinates, all within 17N. - Floydian τ ¢ 17:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The variable in these formulas is a bound variable. It is bound by the summations, written with a capital Greek letter The notation
is convenient shorthand for
The three coefficients and are defined in the beginning of the section Simplified formulae.  --Lambiam 18:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In the simplified formulae, no info is provided for the value of f. I hope its not too much to ask, but say I had a Northing of 5,100,000m and an Easting of 500,000m in zone 17N... could you walk me through the calculations? - Floydian τ ¢ 14:56, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system § Simplified formulae directly quotes the value of f for WGS 84. Anyhow, you might be interested in Charles Karney's paper or software. –jacobolus (t) 17:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is already all laid out in elementary steps that is almost a script. I think it is not going to help you if we write out the steps like,
Step 1: Calculate
Step 2: Calculate
Step 3: Calculate
...
A problem we have with "walking you through the calculations" is that we don't know how we are supposed to make it simpler.  --Lambiam 17:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]