Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AOluwatoyin

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AOluwatoyin}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

AOluwatoyin[edit]

AOluwatoyin (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
207.161.6.149 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

This user has been blocked multiple times for incivility and personal attacks. He just got back, and started doing it again (and without admin intervention). After I reported him, the above IP began making false accusations that I was doing the same thing as AOluwatoyin. This IP writes in the same style as him, and even makes the same personal attacks against me as him. He is obviously a sock puppet, but I was told to make a check user request, so I'm doing it. -- LGagnon 03:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am very strongly opposed to a checkuser being performed in these circumstances due to privacy concerns. Note policy number one at the top of this page: Due to the effort involved, difficulty of interpretation of results and privacy issues raised, checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases. Use other methods first. I do not believe I made any personal attack, rather I have been accused of being a sockpuppet simply because I have a similar writing style as another individual. I am not a sockpuppet of AOluwaytin, we probably don't even live in the same country. If you do decide to perform the check, then I would ask that you please explain how this fits in the the policy detailed above.--142.161.176.66 05:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Mackensen (talk) 11:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask why? No admin has yet explained to me why they ignore this situation. -- LGagnon 12:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go back to the top of the page and read the privacy policy. Mackensen (talk) 12:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.