Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Irpen

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Irpen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppet of now yet un-identified Bryndza (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and AndriyK (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I suspect they are all and the same person. Duca 19:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to the signature which says "Duca", this request above is added by Constantzeanu (talk · contribs · checkuser · block user · block log · edit count) (see this) who chose, for whatever reason, not to sign the request he added or signed it by someone else's name. Anyway, I don't mind anyone checking the allegation about the relation between myself and AndriyK (talk · contribs · checkuser · block user · block log · edit count), especially in view of this arbitration where AndriyK and myself were the opposing parties. As for Bryndza (talk · contribs), please go and check as well. BTW, how do we call submitting frivolous complaints with forged signatures? This is not vandalism. Maybe a "disruption"? --Irpen 02:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You bet I restored Duca's challenge. And no I don't make a secret of it. Anyone can see that I restored it by just checking the history. I don't agree with his style but you had no right to erase his challange here. Constantzeanu 00:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He replaced my entry with his. This was inapropriate and was reverted. Once you posted it properly, I didn't erase it. I welcome any checkuser, including on myself. To be called AndriyK's sockpuppet was rather bemusing. --Irpen 00:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. We should get a good laugh out of all this. Constantzeanu 03:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This request is clearly made in bad faith, offering no evidence for a clearly improbable claim. Duca is admonished for wasting my time in having to read this; further such abuses may result in being blocked. Please do not remove requests from this page until they have been reviewed by a CheckUser, and then only to archive them (unless removing them is required to deal with obvious defamation). Kelly Martin (talk) 03:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Irpen (talk · contribs)

In a sort of "bet" between User:Irpen and User:Alexander007, I was sent out by Irpen self ([1]) to make a request to demonstrate Alexander that he uses no sockuppets. Could someone be gentle with these two users? Neigel von Teighen 23:14, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: This was closed with no action. Thatcher131