Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Roadcrusher

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Roadcrusher}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Roadcrusher

• Roadcrusher (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Bothtones7 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Soondesk6 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Code letter: C
• Supporting evidence:
  • Abuse of {{reviewedfairuse}} by Soondesk6 [1] [2]
    
  • Similar style of poor FU rationales by Bothtones7 [3] [4] [5] [6] and Soondesk6 [7] [8]. This is consistent with Roadcrusher style [9]
    
  • Incorrect usage of template syntax to add source URL by Bothtones7 [10] [11] [12] [13] and Soondesk6 [14] [15] [16]. This is consistent with Roadcrusher style [17] [18]
    
  • Soondesk6 uploads Image:Norway.png and within 6 minutes Bothtones7 adds FU rationale: see full history [19]. In particular, Bothtones7 adds specific URL of source [20], odd if image was uploaded by another person.
  • Bothtones7, within one day of joining, uploads copyvios to Second Avenue Subway and reverts attempts at removal [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]. This is consistent with Roadcrusher [28] [29] [30]. Soondesk6 has not edited that page.

Roadcrusher is a chronic copyright violator who seems unwilling or unable to follow Wikipedia copyright policies. Last suspected sock, Smackdown10, was blocked following my request [31] for 24 hours. 11 days after the block, Bothtones7 joined and immediately in similar fashion uploaded copyvios to Second Avenue Subway. Due to length of break between socks, I gave a chance to see if behaviour would improve with guidance, which it did not (see User talk:Bothtones7), eventually leading to block by User:JeremyA. Accidentally noticed Soondesk6 when Bothtones7 added FU rationale to Image:Norway.png (see above), and with Soondesk6 adding poor FU rationales and abusing {{reviewedfairuse}} on Image:Bánh chuối.jpg and Image:Evaporated milk.jpg, I am concerned that Soondesk6 is deliberately concealing copyvio behaviour. I am certain that Bothtones7 is a Roadcrusher sock, but not Soondesk6.

I fear dealing with these problems constantly for weeks may cause zealousness on my part, so I will likely tag all problem images and move on after this RFCU, regardless of outcome. Kelvinc (talk) 06:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

 Note: - added Roadcrusher (talk · contribs) to the above list

 Confirmed - Alison ^❤ 18:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

 Clerk note: blocked and tagged. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Roadcrusher

• Roadcrusher (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Roadcrusher1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Roadcrusher2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Roadcrusher3 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Roadcrusher4 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Code letter: C.
• Supporting evidence: This user ignores copyright policies on a regular basis. Check talk pages for evidence. ([32], [33], [34], [35]) Chupper 02:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

 Unnecessary. The account names say it all. --Deskana (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.