Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sap ip
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Sap ip[edit]
- Sap ip (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Indiancrusader (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- CODE LETTER:B
- Identical edit to Sonal Shah[1] by Indiancrusader as had been made by Sap ip [2]. The edit was made shortly after Sap ip was blocked for WP:BLP violation [3] suggesting a block evading sock.Zuppeandsalad (talk) 04:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Unrelated — Rlevse • Talk • 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Sap ip[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 06:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC) |
- Sap ip (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Whereisjack (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- CODE LETTER: E:
- Supporting evidence:
- See contribs. Sap ip see contribs is an SPA who added racist WP:BLP comments to Sonal Shah and received warnings for unsourced commentary and vandalism already [4]. Shortly thereafter, sock puppet User:Whereisjack showed up and edit-warred in tandem with Sap ip and gamed the 3rr system in order to put racist and hateful messages in the article of an important public figure see article history. There is sufficient pattern matching to suspect sockpuppetry.Zuppeandsalad (talk) 06:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Unrelated but look at meatpuppeting and SPA issues. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:24, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Please check the following WP:SPA's that are also editing this article. I find it very odd that so many SPAs are involved here:
- Zuppeandsalad (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Pebbles42 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kohlgill (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Unless these match up, I am thinking we need to warn up the first set of accounts, and then block on behavior if there are any recurrences. Jehochman Talk 04:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Unrelated to each other and unrelated to the first set. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.