Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 August 18
What do you think of my first page? Does it make sense? It is mostly just transfered from my entries on wiki/Craven and has come about because I realized that geology doesn't belong on a page about a civic district and that I'd have to split the subject up, hence wiki/Aire_Gap. I have also moved some bits into wiki/Craven_Fault and wiki/Airedale
Kildwyke (talk) 05:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
To who it may concern, My name is Jacopo Trinca, I am posting a new article about a new contemporary art gallery in London. The article is not finished yet, but it will be completed in the next days.
Jacopotrinca (talk) 16:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I don't know how to use the editing software, but this information is clear, legible, and cited properly?
Tarmarcot (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Reviewed. Needs more reliable sources. Comments on Talk:Cuban espresso. --Lexein (talk) 21:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Please review.
Ladyshauncia 17:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Just revamped the article, added new content, new sections and several inline citations. I would like to know if it would be appropriate to remove the "No footnotes" template.
Brainbeat (talk) 18:27, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Looking for suggestions to better this page.
Jenstew2012 (talk) 19:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Any feedback for this new article would be greatly appreciated.
August 24, 2011 - I have added additional sources and references to this article. Any feedback to de-orphan the article are appreciated.
RCEastwood (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request a review of this new article about the U.S. company Marnie Rose Agency, which I believe meets the criteria for noteability and for third-party references. Ideally, the "new article" tag can then be removed. Thanks!
MathewDemek (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I have started to re-write this new article on the band Typhoon. I would like advice on how to make it less biased and more organized.
Angelinthesnow (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Freshly created, please review. I think I've dotted all the t's and crossed the eyes. Lexein (talk) 21:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Bump. --Lexein (talk) 08:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Done - by another editor --Lexein (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
I would like to request someone review my article and take the "unreviewed article" template off the top of my article, Tony J. Fernandez.
Thank you for your time.
Content Scribbler (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
This is an article about J. Jeener, who is cited in the opening paragraph of the article on Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. There is a possible conflict of interest, as J. Jeener is a member of my family (second cousin). For this reason I had the text I wrote reread by Richard Ernst (Nobel laureate) for approval and possible correction before uploading.
As it is the first wikipedia article I write, I would like an external opinion before making it public.
Thanks
Smassar (talk) 23:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've looked it over and made several edits, wikified, wikilinked. May need a section about "early life" - it's a bio, after all. Needs (partial) bibliography. Also, needs a few more sources. --Lexein (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the input. Ive made some changes. One of my main sources is the complete CV of Jeener. But it does not seem to me I can cite it, as this is -as far as I know- not public information.
Smassar (talk) 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Looking pretty good, but moving discussion to User talk:Smassar/Jean Jeener --Lexein (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Need someone to review my article please.
Cyberwombat (talk) 23:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Please advise that this page is acceptable in order to remove the temporary template