Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Digitalican/Archive
Digitalican
- Digitalican (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
13 October 2012[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppets
- GruessGott (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Observator Simiae (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Digitalican (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Michael_J._Mullany (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
GruessGott, Digitalican, and Michael all paste large amounts of WP:TLDR original research on the the Christian Science talk page and a lot of off topic, or peripherally on topic material, and also make generally similar arguments based on the same misunderstandings of policies. Both GruessGott and Michael mention that they come from academia and make "this isn't the way we do it in academia" type comments. Michael does research in computer user satisfaction while Digitalican is a computer administrator. It seems to be either meat puppetry or sock puppetry, I am hoping the CU can differentiate between that (they may also be all at the same university as well). Both Michael and Digitalican insufficiently copy and paste from sources [1][2]. I've been fairly suspicious since this comment from Observator Simiae, which appears to confirm that outside discussions are going on: [3]. I've named the case after an editor that doesn't use his real name to avoid any embarrassment etc for the named person. I think I have taken reasonable precautions. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:56, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
Confirmed as one editor:
- Digitalican (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Observator Simiae (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Dator Tranquillitas (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- The other two are
Unrelated to each other and to Digitalican. — Coren (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Administrator note Digitalican blocked one week, the two other confirmed ones have been indeffed and tagged. De728631 (talk) 14:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)