Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harry (singer)/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Harry (singer)

Harry (singer) (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
16 December 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

I just came across the IP address doing some weird edits and checked their contributions and opened a can of worms. 86.5.176.46 has edited (and in some cases created) the userpages of all the accounts (examples: [1][2][3][4][5]). User:Simpsons (band) has also edited some of the other userpages. User:B&L Recordings has edited them as well. Each userpage is something to do with The Simpsons. –anemoneprojectors22:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

05 January 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

The user page is a fake type of Simpson's page typical of the other socks. I am One of Many (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

21 March 2015
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

The IP address is the same as that from the previous case, and has editted the user page of B&LTVC. User:B&LTVC has an obviously similar name to User:B&L Recordings from the previous case, and has created his user page as in infobox for Mr. Burns consistent with the fascination with The Simpsons television show from the previous case. Whpq (talk) 03:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
No worries. There are days when I think ALL sock may be Mangoeater.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

24 February 2016

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Quack.[6][7] SummerPhDv2.0 03:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

That is based on my blind trust of Binksternet. Unless I'm misunderstand him here (or the warning was a mistake).
It probably doesn't matter much: Harry is de facto banned and the edits shown here indicate no chance of editing "under the radar". - SummerPhDv2.0 16:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Vanjagenije: For some reason, your ping did not show for me. I just happened to see the update on my watch list. Please see my comments above. - SummerPhDv2.0 03:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30 May 2016

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Compare to the confirmed sock's edits at [24]:

Andresjrl97

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Clerk note:: I believe Andresjrl97 is a sock and should be blocked, based on SummerPhD's evidence and the previously established behavioural connection via IPs (see the archive) to previously confirmed socks; however checkuser is not possible. The IP is registered to Nottingham City Council. I reviewed the IP's contribs and I see that they were making the same kind of edits up to May 31, but they are currently active and seem to have moved on to an entirely different topic area, so I think that the IP has been assigned to a different user. I'll leave it up to admin discretion whether to block the IP, but I'm inclined to leave it unless it returns to the master's behaviour. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 13:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]