Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reargun/Archive

Reargun

Reargun (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Report date February 5 2010, 17:30 (UTC)[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets [edit]

BerelZ (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
216.209.86.141 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Dougweller [edit]

I have been in a dispute with Reargun over his edits to Khirbet Qeiyafa and David, where I've seen his edits as pov (and I'm sure he's seen mine the same way). On January 28th he wrote on this talk page "Enjoy yourself Dougweller, I am going to lose you". Although BerelZ's first edit was the day before, I think on the basis of WP:DUCK he is certainly a sock of Reargun. On that basis I put a suspected sock tag on BerelZ's user page, with an explanation on Reargun's page [1] explaining to him how he could instead link to it as an alternate account and there would be no problem. The IP's recent edits are similar edits to the same article, and I think the old edits are also revealing. BerelZ wants me banned.[2] I wasn't going to make this official but given the most recent edits I thought it a good idea. I'll notify all 3 accounts. Dougweller (talk) 17:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users [edit]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )

Current status –

Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Dougweller (talk) 17:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Clerk endorsed –MuZemike 18:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). No comment with respect to IP address(es).. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Sock blocked indef by another admin, whilst the main account has been for 2 weeks by myself. Tags where appropriate done. NJA (t/c) 08:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.