Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rian13/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Rian13

Rian13 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
03 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Previous editors Rian13 and Rian16 have been blocked for persistently uploading non-free images and other disruptive edits. Now we have Rian19, who has received several warning for the same breaches of image policy, and targets the same articles as previous incarnations, such as Jade Goody and Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps. Rodhullandemu 20:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • Blocked most recent account indefinitely per WP:DUCK and for multiple copyright violations. --John (talk) 20:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Everyone's blocked, so there isn't much else to do here. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

11 March 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

This is a prolific sockmaster who is easily detected because he always targets the same articles, Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps and Jade Goody being the most obvious. S/he also uploads non-free images with neither source nor fair-use rationales. Previous socks already blocked include Rian16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Rian19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Similarity of name is also indicative, per WP:DUCK. Rodhullandemu 18:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

05 April 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Per request on my talk page. Behavioral evidence mostly. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed that

are all the same.
Effective rangeblocks would have to be numerous and big here. Recommend periodic sweeps for a bit (feel free to ping me). Pages created by this user should be considered for speedy deletion as per WP:CSD#G5. Amalthea 11:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    • Users blocked/tagged, pages nuked. TNXMan 13:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Rian13 (talk · contribs). User indef blocked since 2010 for image policy and multiple account violation. Appears to have emerged again as Rian2008 (talk · contribs). This account, which began editing on 6 November, appears to have a similar editing pattern to the sockmaster and its various socks. Rian13 often added images incorrectly to articles. So far I've found this from Rian2008. Also some unsourced material has been added (like this) though that's less of a problem. I know it's early days, but there are actually several accounts using this name, all of which have been blocked for disruptive editing, suggesting to me this is just the latest disguise of Rian13. Examples of others include Rian2010 (talk · contribs), Rian2011 (talk · contribs), Rian117 (talk · contribs), Rian16 (talk · contribs) and Rian19 (talk · contribs). The common interest between them all seems to be UK celebrities, chart music and reality shows. Generally they seem to start off editing fine, then things go down hill. Paul MacDermott (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • Everything I can find on the Rian13 socks is  Stale. I am however fairly familiar with the sockmaster and would call this confirmed on behavioural evidence. I've blocked the account and tagged it as a sock accordingly.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks like everything is taken care of. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 19:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]