Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sallieparker/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sallieparker

Sallieparker (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
30 May 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


New user, first edits were removal of sourced information at Joseph Breen like [1] and insertion and reinsertion of malformed and poorly supported NPOV material like here and here, complete with personal attacks in edit summaries and on user pages like here. These are the same issues with Sallieparker like here and elsewhere. Note identical use of "scurrilous" in edit summaries and habitual use of "Marxist" as a pejorative term like here. Note also that Sallieparker was given a final warning here by Drmies right here for identical behavior. Note also ANI thread here. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Blocked the sock for absolutely unacceptable disruption. I'd second the request for a CU, for what that's worth. Writ Keeper  15:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sheesh. Sickening. Thanks Writ Keeper. I third that request. Moreover, I'm going to indef Sallieparker for the repetition of those slurs and the socking and the continued POV disruption at the article. Here's an editor we don't need. Drmies (talk) 16:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm no expert in sock puppet detection, but given that "User:SallieParker" says on their user page "Sallie Parker is a former financial journalist who has been stationed in New York, Paris, London, and Seattle. Her interests include whatever she's been reading about in the last day or so," I think I would bet any amount up to and including my house and my dog that this SPI won't be a waste of time. Carrite (talk) 16:11, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, "boychik" is clear enough. And thanks, but I'm not interested in taking over your mortgage or that fleabag of yours. One of each is enough. :) FWIW, I doubt there'll be any sleepers at this moment; I think, though, that CU information will be helpful in the future if they ever get cleverer at socking. Drmies (talk) 16:19, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]