Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheBellaTwins1445/Archive

TheBellaTwins1445

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This IP's only edit was to support TheBellaTwins1445's out-of-process FAC nomination, smells like WP:DUCK. – jona ✉ 00:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The evidence is too weak. One Ip edit is just not enough to block someone. CLosing the case. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:09, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanjagenije: Looks like another one has been created. – jona ✉ 14:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Please, check Loquis56489 to the master. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed + Perros4550 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). The master also does a significant number of logged-out edits. Blocked the master one week and blocked/tagged the two socks. The one-week block may be extended if they evade their block during the week. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: He is acting like a duck, it is not the first time he has been associated with that ip range (see archives). Additionally, in his user page he says that he lives in Cuautitlán Izcalli, IP where he comes from. Aníbal (Talk) 17:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look, you're asserting that this is ducky, but you're not providing any evidence. You are obviously familiar with the case; I am not. Please don't ask me to read through the contribs of the cases in the archives: explain your thinking. It is not enough to say that edits from within a very wide IP range have previously been associated with this account. Girth Summit _(blether) 22:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aníbal is trying to point that both TheBellaTwins1445 (banned in en.wp for continuous sockpuppeting) and that IP geolocalized in the same city the former claims to live in created two AfDs in en.wp and es.wp for the same article (Edén Muñoz), with the same rationale, and almost at the same time. Seems like a very likely block evasion to me. -sasha- (talk) 23:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK - now I understand. Sorry, I was being dense before. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Additional information needed - What is it about that AfD nomination that makes you think the IP is TheBellaTwins1445? Please don't make us search through their contribs to try to find the connection, spell it out for people who have never come across this editor before. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it's obvious this is block evasion (sorry for my earlier confusion). The IP's /48 range has been blocked for a year by another admin. I've closed the AfD they initiated procedurally. Nothing left to do here, closing. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]