Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wonderfool
Wonderfool
- Wonderfool (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wonderfool/Archive.
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
4 June 2024[edit]
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets[edit]
- Denazz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
- User has been outted as a Wonderfool-connected account on another project pbp 22:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
- @Spicy: please see here pbp 23:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
Additional information needed - where? The account is not blocked on any wiki. I note that the OP currently seems to be involved in a dispute with this user on Wiktionary. Spicy (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- OK, well, considering that the primary project that they edit on does not see it fit to block them, that their handful of edits to this project seem entirely inoffensive, and that this report appears to be retaliatory in nature, I am not inclined to do anything, but I'll leave this open for someone else to review. Spicy (talk) 16:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Spicy I'm personally not encouraged when it's a user who continues to create socks despite having been unblocked after having been blocked for socking... on what is now their home wiki.... In addition, a now-17 year history of socking here which earned them a ban from English Wikipedia at the beginning of that time is not inspiring.
- I do agree about the retaliation appearance. I don't think that means we do nothing, I think that means we ameliorate both, at most a warning for one and a block for the other.
- Several of the socks identified on that page from the past year of creation have wandered their way onto en.wp, besides the above-identified, with overlap by time present:
- Phacromallus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Demonicallt (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fond of sanddunes (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- P. Sovjunk (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Jewle V (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- OK, well, considering that the primary project that they edit on does not see it fit to block them, that their handful of edits to this project seem entirely inoffensive, and that this report appears to be retaliatory in nature, I am not inclined to do anything, but I'll leave this open for someone else to review. Spicy (talk) 16:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
