Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoyojojoop

Yoyojojoop

Yoyojojoop (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoyojojoop/Archive.

14 June 2024[edit]

– An administrator or SPI clerk requires more information to determine what action to take.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Christmas or not (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)

Yoyojojoop (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

The user is back to wreak havoc! Saqib (talk) 08:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - the SPI filed under the wrong title. Master is Yoyojojoop. — Saqib (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So the socks of Yoyojojoop have a pattern of editing pages related to Faisalabad and Pakistani lawmakers. Generally, socks of Yoyojojoop first tend to make minor, unconstructive edits - and do not make outright vandalism - but then they include obvious vandalism as well. In this case, User:Christmas, since the creation of their account, began by editing pages related to Faisalabad and then progressed to making minor edits to BLPs on Pakistani lawmakers. While their current edits are not pure vandalism but unconstructive so I felt it's important to note this account for the record as it could potentially escalate into vandalism sooner or later. Having said that, if a CU yields no connection, the account can remain unblocked, and I will monitor it for any engagement in pure vandalism. However, if it does, it should be promptly blocked to prevent future damage to BLPs and save others time. — Saqib (talk) 12:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Additional information needed - Saqib, you haven't actually provided any evidence here. I've blocked AqeelWakeel, who is Confirmed to Yoyojojoop, but to justify running a check on Christmas or not I would need some behavioural evidence, which you haven't presented. I'm not familiar with the case - can you please spell it out? Girth Summit _(blether) 11:31, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]