Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mykungfu (6th)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Mykungfu (6th)[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Mykungfu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Report submission by

RoBoTam^ice 15:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Editor uses same citation and editing style as banned user Mykungfu, specifically to circumvent ban in order to place NNPOV edits within, or create NNPOV articles related to Alpha Phi Alpha.[1]

Banned editor Mykungfu often attempts to create several "stealth accounts" for both vandalism and seemingly innocuous edits,[2] for purposes of bolstering arguments and possibly in pursuit of adminship.

Suspected sock follows Mykungfu's MO of retaliatory sockpuppet accusations of editors placing warnings on his/her pages, [3] as well as MKF's penchant for goading/wikilawyering w/ same targets.[4][5]

Suspected sock follows Mykungfu's MO of using several accounts to create articles written in a POV favorable to edits he/she wishes to insert into Alpha Phi Alpha, often with citations that either do not support or clearly contradict the proffered POV. [6] [7]. Editor makes heavy usage of same cite sources and links to Google books as MKF puppetmaster.

Comparison: Edits of MKF sock User:NinjaNubian [8] vs. User:RobertOgleFan [9]

there is other proof that would likely be apparent to an administrator that it would probably not be prudent to disclose to the sock.-RoBoTam^ice 15:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SexyNupe2000 RobertOgleFan (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that showing the results of a checkuser case is goading as stated above. Especially since I was accused not once [10] but twice [11] in a day. RobertOgleFan (talk) 17:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This revert in by an IP (the first revert) that the IP has made and ROF bringing my sandbox up earlier in ANI looks suspicious. MKF is notorious for stalking me and other users who he doesn't agree with. miranda 03:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

That diff about the sandbox sealed it--the chances of a new user knowing about that are slim to none. All accounts blocked. Blueboy 96 18:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]