Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nukeh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Nukeh[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Nukeh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Doug youvan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 08:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

User:Nukeh (who is indefintely blocked) used the sig 'Doug Youvan' [1], and their editing patterns cover many of the same topic areas (related to evolution and creationism).

Comments

User:Nukeh received a threat of violence in an edit tag and was "banned" to freeze the record for criminal prosecution of a series of editors, including a consortium of editors from www.kcfs.org who edit under User:Hrafn and who illegaly use Kansas state funds (state salaries and facilities) to try to influence the Kansas School Board elections. The relationship between User:Nukeh and User:Doug youvan is protected by attorney-client privilege. Hrafn made this accusation within 24 hrs of a proposed Youvan v Dawkins debate.Doug youvan (talk) 07:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm, if you bothered to read the www.kcfs.org forums (where I haven't posted for some time) properly, you would have discovered that I am (i) an individual & (ii) from nowhere near Kansas. The "threat of violence", "criminal prosecution", and "proposed Youvan v Dawkins debate" exist only in your mind. I will take the claim of "attorney-client privilege" to be an admission of sufficient relationship between yourself and said indef-blocked user as to amount to at least a "meat-puppet" relationship (and most probably outright sockpuppetry). Thank you for clearing this up. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 07:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Block-evading sock, continuing the pattern of legal threats and disruption for which the parent account was blocked. I've blocked Doug youvan (talk · contribs) indefinitely. MastCell ^Talk 19:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]