Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/RunedChozo
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- RunedChozo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- NotAWeasel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- PSPMario (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 72.178.235.28 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: F.
It has been asserted that the user RunedChozo has been using the account NotAWeasel as a sockpuppet for the following reason:
- The majority of use by the account NotAWeasel, coincides with a period in which RunedChozo was blocked from editing.
- Similarities in edit history. Note the focus in both users edit histories for articles relating to Beit Hanoun
- The similar strange habit of adding new sections to talk pages by editing a pre-existing section as noted here and here
- The unique claim of the feelings of ownership of the article PlayStation Portable by the user ZakuSage for both users on the same day as seen here/here and here.
It should also be noted that in the past this user has been confirmed to be engaged in the act of sock puppetry with the use of the account Wheelygood, and by acting as a separate person with the IP 129.7.35.126.
If anyone else has further evidence please add them here. - ZakuSage 21:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As discussed at here at WP:AN/I, I believe there is need for a thorough CU on this case. Regards, Asteriontalk 03:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
[edit]The user RunedChozo has been using the account NotAWeasel to personally harass me in some sort of sick grudge in both editing the article PlayStation Portable and in editing the article's talk page. After the sockpuppet account was banned, the puppeteer user continued to harass me by falsely claiming that I was attempting to claim ownership over the same article. He then went way out of line by making entirely false accusations on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#ZakuSage|Administrator's noticeboard]]. I fear continued harassment by this user and will be seeking further help in dealing with him. In the meantime I would like him exposed as the sockpuppeteer he is. - ZakuSage 19:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have no evidence and no case. I have no relation to NotAWeasel, I note that wikipedia policy mentions that users on contentious issues like Beit Hanoun will often arrive. I note that YOU have serious page ownership issues and continually revert any changes made to the PSP article since your version some months ago. I am also tired of your harassment campaign against me.RunedChozo 21:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I saw his claim, despite your illegal removal of comments that you just didn't like, and I saw that it had meaning. There's nothing to your so-called proof and you know it. RunedChozo 23:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not the place to talk about this, but not only were his/your comments entirely disruptive, they were a personal attack which has no place on Wikipedia and I was entirely justified in removing it. - ZakuSage 00:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If you can confidently assert you're not him, why don't you agree to a checkuser? My experience, and that of others, is that users tend to puff and blow smoke when asked for a checkuser if it'll turn up true, but they'll jump at the chance to clear their name if not. So how about it, RunedChuzo? Patstuarttalk|edits 00:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This case is just ZakuSage's bad faith and a method by which he is harassing me. He's done so on a temp page I am working on to try to improve an article, he's lied about me and other users, and he is behaving in nothing but bad faith. I have no problem with a CheckUser because I know it will clear me, just as I know it has already shown before that I am not the person he is accusing me of being. RunedChozo 19:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user is now engaging in moving the report for vandalism purposes. - ZakuSage 20:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I got confused about what was being created, because the filthy liar ZakuSage KEPT CREATING THIS LYING BULLCRAP IN MY USER SPACE. I apologize for moving it and THIS page I won't move again. RunedChozo 20:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- THAT was moved long ago. Please cease your childish behavior, I have already reported you for vandalism. - ZakuSage
- Conclusions
All named accounts have been indef blocked. Closing. --Akhilleus (talk) 06:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]