Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 3

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template simply links to too few articles. Four albums to be exact. None of the band members have articles. Geschichte (talk) 17:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ship burial customs in Germanic paganism with Template:Death in Germanic mythology.
Interrelated topic, could possibly be collected in one and the same template? PPEMES (talk) 17:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose While the names make it sound like it would be appropriate, Ship burial customs in Germanic paganism is basically just a list of ship burial sites. The death in Germanic mythology doesn't (and shouldn't) include other burial sites and adding ship burials would be inappropriate. I would suggest renaming Ship burial customs in Germanic paganism to {{Ship burial customs in Germanic paganism}}. --Trialpears (talk) 15:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I meant rename to {{Ship burial in Germanic paganism}} as a rename to the current name doesn't make sense. --Trialpears (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Germanic mythology with Template:Germanic paganism.
Separate template (created 26 June 2019) could as well merge with Template:Germanic paganism to keep "paganism" and "mythology" collected, as seen in Template:Anglo-Saxon paganism and Template:Norse paganism topics? PPEMES (talk) 17:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The idea is to regard the religion more as a whole, as seen in the attached examples. PPEMES (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per PPEMES's reasoning. While I take Ffranc's point, Christianity has borrowed all sorts of things from all over Europe and the Near East, even various gods and goddesses (various "saints", mostly decanonized in recent years). — AReaderOutThatawayt/c 16:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).