Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused award icon template. Gonnym (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused tables as as they were recently subst into their articles. Gonnym (talk) 18:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the banner uses the auto doc which uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused storm table template. Gonnym (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This template is literally identical to {{1x}} – it just returns its first unnamed parameter. For some reason, this was used at the now-historical Wikipedia:Database reports/Range blocks. There is no reason that historical page's IPs need to be wrapped in this template, so subst and delete. No need to redirect; this is a very unlikely search term. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are only two navigable links remaining, which just isn't enough to justify having a navbox any longer. The rest of the articles that were present are not notable topics and have been redirected. Ss112 04:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of this nature has previously been deleted Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 July 26#Template:Trudeau sidebar

Nav aid that is a duplication or redundant to {{Stephen Harper}}. Link spam at its worst in my view and is discouraged by MOS:LEADELEMENTS ="The placement of a sidebar in the lead is generally discouraged" as talked about at November 2020 RfC. Created by Charles sockpuppets despite Canadian politicians not using these an objection by the Canadian Wikiproject. In Canada we simply don't follow the American example of these on every related page we use the bottom footer.Moxy🍁 00:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, for similar reasons as the Trudeau sidebar (which was a creation of the same sock puppeteer). It's unnecessary and unwanted. Renerpho (talk) 01:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.