Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Assessment/Requests/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Archive 1

I have significantly rewritten liberal paradox and would greatly appreciate someone looking over it. --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 23:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
@Kzollman: No change from : Article contains a significant amount of jargon and unencyclopedic language I'd like to see cleaned up first. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012
No change from : Going higher requires a good article nomination. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Timeline of the 2011 Egyptian revolution under Hosni Mubarak's rule
No change from : Going higher requires a featured article nomination or A-Class review. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
2014 Venezuelan protests --Zfigueroa (talk) 02:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
@Zfigueroa: No change from : Going higher requires a good article nomination. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Colombian presidential election, 2014 – upgraded from its original stub-class as the election has progressed, now the election has been completed needs re-assessing. Richard3120 (talk) 09:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
@Richard3120: No change from : Going higher requires a good article nomination. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Government of Japan - Improved the article quite abit. Requesting re-assess. -TheInfernoX (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
@TheInfernoX: No change from : Going higher requires a featured article nomination or A-Class review. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Parliament of Australia - I have significantly edited this article over the last few months. I think it needs reassessment. Superegz (talk) 06:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
@Superegz: No change from : Going higher requires a good article nomination. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Centre-right politics - There seems to be enough content to upgrade it to Start-class. HapHaxion (talk) 00:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@HapHaxion: Outdated: Already assessed as . theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Frisco City Council - Recently created article. --Mr.Election (talk) 01:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
@Mr.Election: Outdated: Already assessed as . theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Stephen Bannon - was listed "low", needs reassessment ASAP as affects Pres.-Elect Trump transition significantly Brianhe (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
@Brianhe: Outdated: Already assessed as mid-importance. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Corruption in the United States - was originally under the purview of WikiProject United States Public Policy, which has shut down, so I've grandfathered it under the American politics task force. Please assess it for importance. Qzekrom (talk) 03:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ozekrom: Outdated: Already assessed as Low-importance. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Kotleba - People's Party Our Slovakia - I have significantly corrected the article's numerous typographical errors and edited several awkward passages and paragraphs, and also fleshed out its lead section. The article certainly is nowhere near a "Start-Class" entry now, and needs re-assessment as soon as possible. Alexander Zubatov (talk) 17:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
@Alexander Zubatov: Changed from →: This was probably an outdated request, but hey. Nice job anyway! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 01:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I have re-written Constitutional coup almost in its entirety. I'm uncertain of its quality and importance, especially given that it was written mostly by an inexperienced editor. Please help review its quality and importance Havashahaba (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
@Havashahaba: Changed from →: This is pretty close to C-Class, but I'd like to see more rigorous adherence to the manual of style, especially for section headings. Nice work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

No change on importance: High-importance seems pretty reasonable. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
1660 state of emergency in Denmark has been extensively expanded and is no longer start-class. It's quality and importance needs reviewing. --RugnirViking (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Changed from → and from High to Mid-importance: Nice work! For B-Class, I'd like to see more effort to include inline citations, but it's nearly there! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Horia Sima has been extensively rewritten, expanded, and sourced and had been previously rated B-class by WikiProject Romania, although it is still listed as start-class overall/by this WikiProject. Its quality needs reviewing. RevAndroid (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
@RevAndroid: Outdated: this WikiProject currently assesses the article as . theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Jevrem Grujić - an article I have created, never had assessment, would love tips, rating..etc thank you! Aeengath (talk) 22:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Outdated: Article is assessed as , that seems pretty fair to me. Nice work! For , I'd like to see some more editing for NPOV, particularly in the notes, and better flow in the text, among other things. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Positional voting has been extensively expanded and it is no longer a start-class article. Its quality and importance needs reviewing. Mencor (talk) 09:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
@Mencor:: Changed from → and from Low- to Mid-importance: Good job! For B-Class, I'd like to see much better and more diverse citation, instead of one paper used sparingly– and I'd also like the technical terms to be rewritten to appeal to the broadest audience possible. I think the tables can be centered, among other aesthetic choices, too. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Fairness Project - an editor recently shifted the classification to a C but specifically noted that they believed it satisfied the B-class requirements too, so I thought I'd ask for an editor to consider the various bits. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
@Nosebagbear:Outdated: This article is currently classified as a good article. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Proposed political status for Puerto Rico - Re-organized article and improved appearance, added links to other relevant articles. Requesting re-assessment for C-status JaykeBird (talk) 03:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
@Jaykebird: Changed from →: Nice! For B-Class, I think the maintenance tags provide a pretty clear guide on where to go next. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Political bias is currently Class-C but lacks a rating on the importance scale. Also, a significant amount of content has been added since its last assessment. Please review. Thanks in advance, your help is greatly appreciated.
Outdated: This article is currently listed as High-importance on this WikiProject.

No change from : This article is far too focused on the United States to be assessed as B-Class. I'd also consider removing the section on the MRC– it's not particularly relevant, and the editing for WP:NPOV is lacking. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Selangor Sultanate - Recently improved from the 'stub' class. Requires reassessment. Froswo (talk) 11:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@Froswo: Changed from →: Nice work! You may want to consider inviting a peer review for the article, and then nominating it for good article status. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
European Parliament election, 2014 (Netherlands) --BasBr1 (talk) 03:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
@BasBr1: Changed from →: Good work! For C-Class, try making the election process clearer for those who aren't with the jargon, among other edits. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Mass incidents in China Steggy1 (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Changed from →: Nice work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 04:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Yair Netanyahu Isi96 (talk) 23:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Changed from →: Nice work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 04:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Parliament Hill --Aknell4 (talk · contribs) 15:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
@Aknell4: No change from : Going higher requires a featured article nomination or A-Class review. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 04:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)