Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Hunter College/Rhetoric of Science (Spring 2016)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- Rhetoric of Science
- Institution
- Hunter College
- Instructor
- Trudy Smoke
- Wikipedia Expert
- Ian (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- The role of rhetoric in science writing
- Course dates
- 2016-02-01 – 2016-05-16
- Approximate number of student editors
- 15
This course is an introduction to the history, theory, and practice of rhetoric and the role that rhetoric and language play in the construction of scientific knowledge.
| Student | Assigned | Reviewing |
|---|---|---|
| Danassau | ||
| MelissaRHarden | ||
| Arusso91 | ||
| Taades | ||
| nnnatalia |
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 29 February 2016 | Thursday, 3 March 2016
- In class - Wikipedia essentials
- Overview of the course
- Introduction to how Wikipedia will be used in the course
- Understanding Wikipedia as a community, we'll discuss its expectations and etiquette.
Handout: Editing Wikipedia
- Assignment - Learn the basics
- Begin the training modules assigned for your course. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 7 March 2016 | Thursday, 10 March 2016
- Assignment - Critique an article
- Review pages 4-7 of the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure. This will give you a good, brief overview of what to look for in other articles, and what other people will look for in your own.
- Evaluate an existing Wikipedia article related to the class, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's talk page.
- A few questions to consider (don't feel limited to these):
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
Resources: Evaluating Wikipedia, Using Talk Pages
Week 3
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 14 March 2016 | Thursday, 17 March 2016
- Assignment - Add to an article
- Add 1–2 sentences of new information, backed up with a citation to an appropriate source, to a Wikipedia article related to the class.